两种外周静脉穿刺方法在系统性硬化症患者中的应用研究.docVIP

两种外周静脉穿刺方法在系统性硬化症患者中的应用研究.doc

  1. 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
两种外周静脉穿刺方法在系统性硬化症患者中的应用研究   [摘要] 目的 探讨能提高系统性硬化症患者一次性静脉穿刺成功率,减轻穿刺时疼痛的静脉穿刺方法。 方法 选择2011年1月~2012年11月张家港市中医医院系统性硬化症9例患者为研究对象,以静脉输液治疗日期为单数者为对照组,日期为双数者为观察组。对照组采用传统的静脉穿刺法,观察组采用改良式静脉穿刺法。比较两组静脉穿刺的一次性成功率及穿刺时患者的疼痛程度。 结果 观察组一次性静脉穿刺成功率(87.1%)明显高于对照组(73.3%),差异有统计学意义(P 0.05);观察组和对照组中度以上疼痛分别为9例和24例,观察组总体疼痛感低于对照组(P 0.05)。 结论 改良式静脉穿刺法能提高系统性硬化症患者静脉穿刺成功率,减轻患者穿刺时的疼痛感。   [关键词] 系统性硬化症;外周静脉穿刺;“握手”法;穿刺角度;负压进针   [中图分类号] R473.5 [文献标识码] C [文章编号] 1673-7210(2014)01(b)-0132-03   Study on the application of two kinds of peripheral venepuncture methods in patients with systemic sclerosis   LI Lijuan HUANG Juan FENG Jiaojiao   Department of Rheumatism, Chinese Medicine Hospital of Zhangjiagang City, Jiangsu Province, Zhangjiagang 215600, China   [Abstract] Objective To explore a applicable method of peripheral venepuncture to improve the one-time achievement ratio of venepuncture and relieve the pain of puncture for patients with systemic sclerosis. Methods 9 patients with systemic sclerosis from January 2011 to November 2012 in Chinese Medicine Hospital of Zhangjiagang City were selected as study objects, for intravenous infusion therapy. The patients whose date of intravenous infusion treatment was odd number were as control group, and the patients whose treatment date was even number were as observation group. The control group was given the conventional venepuncture method, the observation group was given the modified venepuncture method. The one-time achievement ratio of venepunctures and pain response of the two groups were observed. Results One-time achievement ratio of venepunctures in the observation group (87.1%) were higher than that in the control group (73.3%), the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05); there were 9 cases with moderate or above degree of pain in the observation group, while 24 cases in the control group, the genera pain of the observation group was less than that of control (P 0.05). Conclusion The modified venepuncture method for patients wit

文档评论(0)

jingpinwedang + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档