腹腔镜辅助胆道镜保胆取石术135例临床的应用分析.docVIP

腹腔镜辅助胆道镜保胆取石术135例临床的应用分析.doc

此“医疗卫生”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
腹腔镜辅助胆道镜保胆取石术135例临床的应用分析

腹腔镜辅助胆道镜保胆取石术135例临床的应用分析   【摘要】 目的:分析腹腔镜辅助胆道镜保胆取石术的手术方法和适应证。方法:回顾性分析中山大学附属第一医院东院2008年3月-2012年3月135例行腹腔镜辅助胆道镜保胆取石术患者的临床资料,记为腹腔镜组,选取同期开腹手术患者61例为对照,记为开放组,分析比较两组患者术后疗效及并发症等的差异。结果:腹腔镜组135例患者中共成功施行腹腔镜辅助胆道镜保胆取石术112例,中转为开腹取石术23例,无胆漏、无残留结石、无胆道出血及腹腔感染等,全组术后无死亡。腹腔镜组术后出院时间、并发症、伤口不适时间、镇痛泵使用方面均优于开放组,但住院费用也高于开放组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.01)。结论:腹腔镜辅助胆道镜保胆取石术简单、安全、有效,是治疗胆囊结石的一种值得推广的微创治疗方法。   【关键词】 腹腔镜辅助; 胆道镜; 保胆取石   【Abstract】 Objective:To analyze the operative methods and indications of laparoscopic-choledochoscopy-assisted removal of cholelithotomy.Method:The clinical data of 135 patients undergoing laparoscopic-choledochoscopy-assisted removal of cholelithotomy treatment in the Eastern Hospital of the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University from March 2008 to March 2012 were retrospectively analyzed as the laparoscopic group,while contemporary 61 patients undergoing open cholecystectomy were selected as the comparison,which were recorded as the open group.The postoperative curative effect and complications of two groups were compared.Result:In the laparoscopic group,it had completed successful laparoscopic-choledochoscopy-assisted removal of cholelithotomy to 112 patients in total 135 patients,and 23 patients changed to open cholecystectomy in the operation.There were no leaked,no residual stones,no bleeding or peritoneal cavity infection,and no patient died.The discharge time,complications,time of wound pain,analgesic required of the laparoscopic group were better than those of the open group,but the hospitalization costs of the laparoscopic group was higher than the open group,the differences were statistically significant(P0.01).Conclusion:Laparoscopic-choledochoscopy-assisted removal of cholelithotomy is a simple,safe,and effective operative method and is worth popularizing in minimally invasive treatment of cholelithiasis.   【Key words】 Laparoscopic-assisted; Choledochoscopy; Cholecystolithotomy   First-author’s address:The Second People’s Hospital in Yuancheng District

文档评论(0)

bokegood + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档