ad-hoc vs. standardized and optimized arthropod diversity sampling特别与标准化和优化节肢动物多样性采样.pdfVIP

ad-hoc vs. standardized and optimized arthropod diversity sampling特别与标准化和优化节肢动物多样性采样.pdf

  1. 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
ad-hoc vs. standardized and optimized arthropod diversity sampling特别与标准化和优化节肢动物多样性采样

Diversity 2009, 1, 36-51; doi:10.3390/d1010036 OPEN ACCESS diversity ISSN 2071-1050 /journal/diversity Article Ad-Hoc vs. Standardized and Optimized Arthropod Diversity Sampling Pedro Cardoso 1,2,*, Luís C. Crespo 3, Rui Carvalho 4, Ana C. Rufino 3 and Sérgio S. Henriques 4 1 Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, USA 2 Azorean Biodiversity Group–CITA-A, University of Azores, Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal 3 IMAR–Coimbra Interdisciplinary Center, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal; E-mails: luiscarloscrespo@ (L.C.C.); ana.rufino@ (A.C.R.) 4 Department of Biology, University of Évora, Évora, Portugal; E-mails: rui.m.carvalho@ (R.C.); henriquesbio@ (S.S.H.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: pcardoso@; Tel.: +1-202-633-0661; Fax: + 1-202-786-3141. Received: 6 August 2009 / Accepted: 25 August 2009 / Published: 1 September 2009 Abstract: The use of standardized and optimized protocols has been recently advocated for different arthropod taxa instead of ad-hoc sampling or sampling with protocols defined on a case-by-case basis. We present a comparison of both sampling approaches applied for spiders in a natural area of Portugal. Tests were made to their efficiency, over-collection of common species, singletons proportions, species abundance distributions, average specimen size, average taxonomic distinctness and behavior of richness estimators. The standardized protocol revealed three main advantages: (1)

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

118zhuanqian + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档