中国企业微博道歉的语用学研究.docVIP

  1. 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
中国企业微博道歉的语用学研究.doc

  中国企业微博道歉的语用学研究商务英语论文 --CHPATER ONEINTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction This thesis studies Chinese corporate apologies posted on the perspective ofGrice’s Cooperative Principle (Hereafter CP). on than traditional media. Hence,most corporations oers. As a matter of fact, among all the questions raised by customers, a goodpart of them are plaints. In order to protect their corporate reputation and maintain agood corporation-customer relationship, apology, on the other hand, has bee a monand influential unicate ers. As oneof the most frequently used speech acts in munication, some influential films directedby famous Chinese directors try to tell people the importance of apology to either restorereputation or simply express one’s guilty. “ple ‘sorry ’ can go a long ight not solve the problem, but it letspeople vent their anger.” In this part, the author ent and valueof ay focus more on the perceived use of apologies, rather thananalyzing naturally occurring examples, but cannot do anything due to the infrequency ofapologies in day-to-day interactions, or limited by observation techniques” (Page, 2014:32).Ho the perspective of CP and it’s also very -- rational to explain thefindings ensions. CHAPTER Tills, 2003;Jucker Taavitsainen, 2007; Rundquist, 2007). And a third distinctive area is functions ofapologies as a form of face an, 1959) or as a rapport influencing strategy(Spencer-Oatey, 2008), highlighting the potential risks to the reputation of the personmaking the apology, and the opportunities that apologies present for re-establishing rapportbetann, 2009). On the other hand, most aticresearches has examined data in some form of spoken discourse, or ple, elicited through discourse pletion tasks or dialogue contained in drama).Likeain, andlinguistic studies ine apologies made in public contexts are in their infancy byparison (but see for example, Davies et al., 2007; Gruver, 2011; Harris et al., 2006;Kampf, 2009). Meier’s (1998) overvieitations inexisting research, ethod

文档评论(0)

ggkkppp + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档