- 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
法律语言的语言特征及其翻译原则(外文翻译资料).docx
Statutes and contracts: An analysis of legal speech acts in the English language of the law The Aarhus School of Business, Department of English, Fuglesangs All?4,DK-8210 Aarhus V, Denmark Abstract This paper is concerned with the language used in legal speech acts in legislative texts and contracts in the field of English Contract Law. The central objects of study are regulative functions with a particular view to establishing realization patterns of the rhetorical functions of directive and commissive acts. The findings show that the language of the law characteris-tically selects patterns of regulatives distinct from, for example, the patterns typically selected in everyday conversational English. The characteristics of the language of the law can be interpreted within the adherence to legal institutions, as well as in terms of the face redress required by the socio-pragmatic situation. L Background The field of legal language within the written medium is unique with regard to distinctive lexical features, such as technical terms, archaic expressions, etc., and it is renowned for its syntactic complexity, which has given rise to a number of studies of these aspects (see, e.g. Danet, 1985: 278-287). However, with the exception of a few studies (e.g. Kurzon, 1986; Werther and Helmersen, 1989), little attention has been given to pragmatics and politeness in written legal discourse. In the field of pragmatics (including work on politeness phenomena), research has been concerned primarily with oral discourse, often based on non-sequential hypo-thetical data, and very few studies are concerned with pragmatics and politeness in written discourse (see, e.g. Myers, 1989; Pilegaard, 1990). This paper presents a pragmatic study of a highly specialized discourse, viz. the language of authentic legislative texts and contracts, which are analyzed for socio-pragmatic occurrence and pragmalinguistic realization of regulative acts. Politeness is discussed within a consideration
有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站
文档评论(0)