人工肝对慢性重型肝炎远期预后影响-.docVIP

人工肝对慢性重型肝炎远期预后影响-.doc

  1. 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
人工肝对慢性重型肝炎远期预后影响-

人工肝对慢性重型肝炎远期预后影响*[摘要] 目的 探讨人工肝对慢性重型肝炎肝衰竭远期预后的影响。方法 回顾性分析199例慢性乙型重型肝炎患者,分为人工肝治疗组101例和内科治疗对照组98例,随访3年内患者肝功能CTP分级及存亡状态,两组之间构成比的比较采用χ2检验,采用Kaplan-Meier方法进行生存分析,生存率比较采用Log-Rank检验。结果 不同治疗组肝功能分级的构成比只有半年时差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.358,P=0.015)。治疗后1、2、3年时的差异均无统计学意义。治疗组3年生存率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(χ2=3.840,P=0.050)。结论 人工肝对促进慢性重型肝炎近期恢复疗效确切,对远期肝功能演变无明显影响,但可显著提高慢性重型肝炎患者的远期生存率。 [关键词] 人工肝;慢性重型肝炎;远期预后 [中图分类号] R575.1 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2011)24-159-02 The Effect of Artificial Liver on Long-term Prognosis of Chronic Hepatitis Gravis NIU Chuanzhen ZOU Zhiqiang YANG Shaoping YU Jiguang ZHANG Fuhua MU Shufen GUO Yanmei YU Shengmei LIU Youde ZHAO Xiuqin WANG Cuiying XIE Hui Yantai Infectious Diseases Hospital, Yantai 264001, China [Abstract] Objective To assess the effect of artificial liver on the long-term prognosis of hepatic failure caused by chronic hepatitis gravis. Methods A retrospective analysis was made among 199 cases of chronic hepatitis B gravis, which were divided into the treatment group (artificial liver,101 cases) and the control group (conventional medical treatment,98 cases), with a three-year follow-up of liver function CTP grading and survival condition. χ2 test was taken to make a comparison in constituent ratio between the two groups and Kaplan-Meier method was adopted to make an analysis of survival condition, comparing survival rate with Log-Rank test. Results There was a significant difference in constituent ratio of liver function grading between the two groups (χ2=8.358,P=0.015) only at the middle of a year, with no significant difference at one year, two years and three years after the treatment. Three-year survival rate in the treatment group was higher than that in the control group, with significant difference (χ2=3.840,P=0.050). Conclusion Artificial liver is quite a help to the short-term recovery from chronic hepatitis gravis, with a reliable curative effect, and brings about little effect on long-term development of the liver function. But it can re

文档评论(0)

linsspace + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档