private law commercial paper:私人法律商业票据精品.pdfVIP

private law commercial paper:私人法律商业票据精品.pdf

  1. 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
private law commercial paper:私人法律商业票据精品

Louisiana Law R eview Volume 33 | Numb r 2 The Work of the Louisiana Appellate Courts for the 1971-1972 Term: A Sy mp osium Winter 1973 Private Law : Commercial Paper Ronald L. Hersbergen R pository Citation Ronald L. H rsb rg n, Pri ate Law: Commercial Pap er, 33 La. L. R v. (1973) Available at : http://digitalcommons.law.lsu. du/lalr v/vol33/iss2/14 This Article is brought to you for fr e and op n acc ss by the Law R vi ws and Journals at DigitalCommons @ LSU Law C nt r. It has b n acc pt d for inclusion in Louisiana Law R vi w by an authoriz d administrator of DigitalCommons @ LSU Law C nt r. For more information, pl ase contact sarah.buras@law.lsu. du. LOUISIANA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 33 occurs; by the same token, the court should have power to com- pel the trustee to correct an abuse which has already occurred. It is interesting that the court relies upon the settlors inten- tion as its standard, rather than the less subjective prudent man rule. In his respect, the decision accords with those in other jurisdictions. Huber v. Calcasieu Marine National Bank involved an action against the trustee for alleged maladministration of an inter vivos trust. The settlor of that trust died before the action was brought, leaving her entire estate in two testamentary trusts, one for the benefit of her only child, a son, and the other for the benefit of his six children. It was alleged and sustained that the action against the trustee of the inter vivos trust was an asset of the estate of the settlor and thus became part of the trust property of the testamentary trusts. It remained

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

bodkd + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档