半椎板切除脊髓前后减压治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折临床疗效观察.docVIP

半椎板切除脊髓前后减压治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折临床疗效观察.doc

  1. 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
半椎板切除脊髓前后减压治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折临床疗效观察

半椎板切除脊髓前后减压治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折临床疗效观察[摘要] 目的 探讨半椎板切除脊髓前后减压治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折的临床疗效。 方法 选取我院2010年1月~2011年6月收治的胸腰椎爆裂性骨折患者43例作为观察组,采用半椎板切除脊髓前后减压和椎弓根钉系统复位内固定方法治疗,与采用传统后入路手术治疗的42例对照组胸腰椎爆裂性骨折患者进行比较。 结果 观察组术中出血量、手术时间、术后24 h伤口引流量、骨折愈合时间均明显少于对照组(P 0.05);观察组术后并发症发生率(2.3%)明显低于对照组(14.3%,P 0.05);观察组术后伤椎前缘高度和伤椎后缘高度均明显大于术前,术后Cobb角和椎管容积减少比较术前明显缩小,差异均有统计学意义(P 0.05)。观察组术后Frankel分级评定情况明显好于对照组。 结论 采用半椎板切除脊髓前后减压治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折是一种安全有效的手术方法,手术操作简便且创伤小,术后并发症少且固定可靠,对患者脊柱结构造成的损伤较小,值得临床推广使用。 [关键词] 半椎板切除;脊髓前后减压;胸腰椎骨折 [中图分类号] R681.5 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2012)07(b)-0042-03 Clinical research on semi laminectomy spinal cord before and after decompression in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures TAN Shengfu WU Jianguo Department of Orthopasdics, the People’s Hospital of Yishui County, Shandong Province, Yishui 276400, China [Abstract] Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of semi laminectomy spinal cord before and after decompression in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Methods 43 cases of patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures in our hospital from January 2010 to June 2011were selected as the observation group, who were given the semi laminectomy spinal cord before and after decompression and pedicle screw system internal fixation methods treatment. 42 cases of patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures were selected as the control group, who were given the traditional approach operation treatment. The clinical efficacy of the two groups were compared. Results Amount of bleeding in operation, operative time, amount of postoperative 24 h wound drainage, fracture healing time of the observation group were significantly shorter than those of the control group (P 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group (2.3%) was significantly lower than that of the control group (14.3%, P 0.05). The front height and back height of fracture vertebra after operation were significantly greater than those of before operation in the observation grou

文档评论(0)

linsspace + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档