3国不同粉尘采样器测定结果的比较.pdfVIP

环境与职业医学2∞6 年6 月第 23 卷第 3 期 J Environ Occup M叫， Jun2佣6 VoL23 No , 3 • 253 • 文章编号 :1006-3617(2006)03唰0253阳的 中图分类号 :R135.1 文献标识码 :A {论警} 3 国不同粉尘采样器测定结果的比较 毛革诗1 ，梁娇君1 ，卢明 1 ，李翠玲1 ，陈振龙1 ，杨磊2* 摘要: [阔的] 比较研究3 固不同粉尘采样器的测定结果。[方法] 采用中阁、美国和德国总尘和呼尘采样器 在武昌造船厂的清铲和造型车间于呼吸带高度进行平行采样8 d ，并测定总尘、呼尘浓度。[给采] 中国、美国、德国 的总尘和呼尘采样器的测定结果具有一定的相关性(p 0.05)。但中国总尘采样器的测定结果与美国、德国的结果有差 异(P0.05 );而呼尘间无差异(p 0.05)0 [结论] 我国呼尘采样测定结果与国外采样器测定结果具有可比性。 关键词:总尘;呼尘;采样方法;测定给采;可比性 Comparison ofDifferent Sampling Methods for Determining Dust Concentration MAO Ge-shi , LIANG Jiao -jun , LU Ming , LI Cui-ling , CHEN Zhen-long , YANG Ld* ( 1. Wuhan Hospitα， lfor Occupαtional Diseases prevention and treatment , Wuhan 430071 , China; 2.School ofPublic Health , Tongji Medical College , Huazhong University ofScíence and Technology , Wuhan 430030 , China) Abstract: [ Objective ] Comparative studies on the dust concentration 时th different sampling methods. [ Methods ] We determined the dust contention in the Wuchang shipyard for 8 days with different sampling instruments , i.e. total dust and respirable dust samplers from China , Germany and USA. All the samplers were located in the workplace at a height of respiratory m肘， to make a parallel sampling. [Results ] Using the 刷nplers from ChinalGermanylUSA , there was correlation between the result of total dust and that of respirable du悦.叽\ere w自由 significiant difference in the results of total dust between the Chinese instruments and German or USA instrument自 (p 0.05 ), but no significant difference among the results of respirable dust sampled by threes kinds of samplers ( P 0.05 ) . [Conclution ]叽\e results of respirable dust suggested that Chinese instrument wω comp