Fujian University Logistics Reform in the Prisoner#39;s Dilemma Analysis of.docVIP

下载本文档

8
0
约2.76万字
约 25页
2017-05-13 发布于浙江
举报
版权申诉

Fujian University Logistics Reform in the Prisoner#39;s Dilemma Analysis of.doc

1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

FujianUniversityLogisticsReforminthePrisoner

Fujian University Logistics Reform in the Prisoner#39;s Dilemma Analysis of [Abstract] With the University Logistics continuous deepening of reform, the reform process in some of the deep-rooted contradictions and problems have become increasingly prominent, all causes of social reform back in the A and B sides are often trapped in a “Prisoner’s Dilemma.” Article in the logistics community colleges and universities in Fujian Province to investigate the situation of reform, based on the current proposed reform of the logistic in the main problems, and analysis of logistics-oriented reforms of the social and B sides form a “prisoner’s dilemma” of the causes, focusing on the solution University Logistics and B sides out of the “prisoner’s dilemma” means. [Keywords:] college logistic reform; Prisoner’s Dilemma; Causes and Countermeasures “Prisoner’s Dilemma,” was first used by the U.S. mathematician at Princeton University in 1950, Tucker proposed, which is the most famous case of game theory. “Prisoner’s Dilemma” said is that in a serious arson attack, the police at the scene captured two suspects who were due to insufficient evidence and the judge told them, if you move, and he did not move, then you will serve as a witnesses were acquitted, he will be sentenced to 15 years in prison; if you move, and he strokes, and you will be sentenced to 10 years; If you do not move, he strokes, he was acquitted, you will be sentenced to 15 years; if you do not move, it will each sentenced to one year. But the fact that the per capita in the segregation of the two would make such a calculating process: if he recruit, and I do not move, may take 15 years in prison for 10 years and we have to move, so recruited a cost-effective; if he does not move, I do not move, sitting one years in prison, if the strokes, and immediately released, was also recruited a cost-effective. Taking the above two cases to consider, or recruited a cost-effective. The result is that both strokes,