- 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
床旁快速检测对急性冠脉综合征诊断和预后影响
床旁快速检测对急性冠脉综合征诊断和预后影响 【摘要】目的 对比床旁快速检测与传统实验室方法检测心肌损伤标志物对急性冠脉综合征(ACS)的诊断及预后的影响。方法 回顾性分析2006年1月1日至2010年6月30日首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院急诊科收治已确诊的3467例急性冠脉综合征的患者,记录患者的年龄、性别、既往病史和吸烟史等基本人口资料,以及心肌损伤标志物(CTNI CKMB MYO)、D二聚体、NTproBNP、心脏彩超EF等实验室指标,采用统计学方法比较应用床旁快速检测与实验室检测心肌损伤标志物的患者,在急诊滞留时间(急诊就诊到接受介入或保守治疗之间用时)、入院到住院期间的心血管事件(心衰、室颤、脑血管病)的发生率和28 d病死率的不同。结果 床旁快速检测组的急诊滞留时间、心血管事件发生率和28 d病死率均低于常规实验室检测组(P=0.000),且急诊滞留时间越长,早期肌红蛋白和D二聚体测定值越高,EF测定值越低, 28 d死亡风险越高。结论 床旁快速检测比常规实验室检测能缩短ACS患者的急诊滞留时间,降低心血管事件发生率并能明显改善预后。【关键词】急性冠脉综合征;床旁快速检测;心肌损伤标志物;预后Comparison of point-of-care testing and laboratory testing of myocardial damage markers in the diagnosis and prognosis of acute coronary syndrome YANG Jun, LI Chun-sheng. Department of Emergency, Chaoyang Hospital, Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, ChinaCorresponding author:LI Chun-sheng,Email:lcscyyy@163.com【Abstract】Objective To compare the point-of-care testing (POCT) and laboratory testing of myocardial damage markers in the diagnosis and prognosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods A total of 3467 patients with ACS who were treated in the Emergency Department Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University between January 1, 2006 and June 30, 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. The patient demographics (age, sex, past medical history and smoking history) and laboratory testing results (myocardial damage markers, D-dimer, NTproBNP, and ejection fraction [EF]) were analyzed. The patients who received POCT or laboratory testing of myocardial damage markers were compared with regard to emergency department stay (i.e., the time from the emergency visit to interventional or conservative treatment), cardiovascular events during hospitalization (congestive heart failure, ventricular fibrillation, and cerebrovascular disease), and 28-day mortality rate. Results The emergency department stay, incidence of a cardiovascular event, and 28-day mortality in the POCT group were all lower than that in the laboratory testing gr
有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站
文档评论(0)