行政许可视角下的中国电影审查制度分析word格式论文.docxVIP

优秀毕业论文 精品参考文献资料 Abstract Viewed from the perspective of administrative law, every film has to be subject to the censoring of competent authorities before they are licensed a Film Public Show Permit to be screened in China. Taken in this sense, existing film censorship is typical of administrative license. Since China’s reform on film industry in 2002, Chinese movie projection market has seen an amazing double-digit growth each year. However, no further reform on film censorship has been made in China since 2006. What’s more, in terms of censorship authorities, standards and procedures, there is still a lot in conflict with modern principles of law. Consequently, numbers of industry insiders and scholars are developing the viewpoints that it is increasingly difficult for existing film censorship to cater to the development of film industry. To ensure the healthy progress of film industry, it is necessary to improve relevant laws and systems. As advocated in the Fourth Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party, rule by law means administration according to law. As a result, it is a matter of course to include film censorship, one of the administrative licenses, into the framework of “rule by law and administration according to law”. Beginning with administrative license and based on existing laws and regulations relevant to film censorship in China, the paper digs deep into existing problems arising out of film censorship in China through normative analysis and comparative analysis. In addition, it probes into film censorship in Singapore and the UK, in an attempt to find out ways to improve film censorship in China. Excluding the introduction and conclusions, the paper is composed of four sections: Section I is involved mainly in some concepts related to film censorship, including the concepts of film and censorship, legal attribute of film, the necessity of film censorship, the positioning of administrative laws for fil