翻译理论和社会、心理语言学Translation Studies.pptVIP

Translation Studies 2. Translation theory and socio- and psycholinguistics Krisztina Károly, Spring, 2006 Source: Klaudy, 2003 2.1. Translation theory and sociolinguistics 18th-cent. Hungary ? social relevance of translation gained more importance than its Lic exploration (János Batsányi, Ferenc Kazinczy, Gy?rgy Bessenyei,Sándor Báróczy) pragmatic adaptation (in modern terminology; Neubert 1968) ? the adaptation of the translated work to the needs of the TL audience (e.g., András Dugonics, in 1807, placed Voltaire’s Zadig into a Hungarian context under the title Cserei, egy honvári herceg, what is more, into 10th-century Hungary, the era of Taksony vezér) sociolinguistic research in the 1970’s (Labov 1970, Ferguson 1971, Fishman 1971, Giglioli 1972, Trudgill 1974) ? provides an opportunity for the study of the relationship between translation and society Reproducing individual speech styles in translating literary pieces ? render the individual (social or regional) speech style of the characters (problem of the vertical and horizontal stratification of the 2 Ls E.g., indicating provinciality ? literary Lic norm prevalent in the given century and L E.g., reproducing regional words/dialects (i.e., find TL regional equivalents): Reproducing regional words/dialects: Imre Makai ? translating Solohov’s Silent Don the Hungarian regional equivalents of the regional words and dialect used by proud, brave, and free Cossacks (to reflect the novel’s “Don-like atmosphere”) = the dialect of Hajdúság sociolinguistic reason (Makai, 1981): Cont.: the socioLic reason (Makai 1981, p.574): the two ethnic communities resemble each other both in terms of their evolution and their history. Originally they were homeless peasants and outlaws who banded together and, holding one hand on the plough tail and the other on the hilt of the sword, they became soldier-peasants. The sole difference between them was that the Cossacks first fought against the Czar, and only then did they become his