Publish or Perish批改网提交作文汇总版.docVIP

Published or Perish? Recently, many universities require each graduate student to have at least one paper published before getting the masters degree, which is considered as a good way to evaluate their students. To my opinion, I strongly support this way of evaluating and hope it could be more acceptable. For one thing, paper publishing is a reflection and also a standard of students academic performance and social capabilities. The school can weight how excellent students academic abilities are and how is the performance of execution and communication kept by the students by using this way. It can be a typical new and effective way for school to select talented person besides the traditional way. For another, it also benefit students. They can get an additional way to prove their abilities by paper publishing, it is good for those students who are not good at examinations but research and execution. Whats more, by this requirement, undergraduate students can have an opportunity to be prepared for the learning process and pattern of graduate school. From the foregoing, we can easily draw a conclusion that it is beneficial for universities to require their students to have at least one paper published before getting the masters degree. Universities can have a wider and more comprehensive way to evaluate their students. Therefore, the undergraduate students who want higher education should practice and be prepared for their future. Publish or Perish It is well-known that Chinese have made great progress in science since the founding of new China, and it is no exaggeration to say that we are leaders in some realm. Of course, it is the achievement of thousands of hard-working scientists. However, I do not agree with the value system ‘Publish or Perish’. To begin with, there are some competitions in science, especially in some research hot-spots, such as the biotechnology. Sometimes, we may find some papers are identical with our researches in hand. A