socialequityinredevelopmentandhousingUnitedstatesandkorae王晓晓南京林业大学资料.pptVIP

socialequityinredevelopmentandhousingUnitedstatesandkorae王晓晓南京林业大学资料.ppt

  1. 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Social equity in Redevelopment and Housing——United States and Korea 美韩两国的再开发与住房领域的社会公平 翻译 Translation US law says that CDBG’s “primary objective”: is to benefit low and moderate-income people ;the only other allowable uses are to address “slums and blight” or to meet urgent needs. 美国的律法意为CDBG的主要目的:是使低收入和中等收入的人受益,唯一的其他允许使用要求是”贫民窟和荒芜之地”或以满足紧急需求。 US in some ways, but it is more so in others. Middle-class households in that country are less likely to get benefits that middle-class Americans take for granted, particularly tax write-offs for mortgage interest payments. However ,redevelopment has often led to high-rise apartment buildings that are most affordable for middle-income households ,who can outbid many displaced households. Even in some of the rental public. 美国在某些方面是这样的,其他方面更是。美国中产阶级不太可能拿到他们应该拿到的,尤其是是税务注销按揭利息开支的好处。然而,更新在发展常常使得对于中等收入家庭来说,高层公寓才是最可能买得起的,他们能出更高的价,即使在一些公共租赁区域。 翻译 Translation The overall lesson seems to be that the two governments have attempted to improve social equity but that social equity remains a problem .The historical review shows several positive changes in policy direction, many of them due to political factors. Although the overall impression is of inconsistency, in part because of the sheer number of approaches and program revisions(only a few of which were discussed here),in general both countries have provisions for several dimensions of social equity. 所有的经验教训表明,两国政府都试图改善社会公平,但在社会公平仍然是一个问题.历史回顾表明在政策方向上,因为政策因素的原因都有了一些积极的改变。虽然总的印象是不一致,部分原因是许多方法和程序的修订(其中只有一小部分在这里讨论),但是总的来说两个国家都对有关社会公平的几个方面做出了规定。 Abstract 摘要 *Although he two countries of the United States and Korae are difficult in many ways,they have had some parallel experiences with urban redevelopment.Both have created policies designed to reform previous problems in such areas as forced relocation and lack of provision,of low –income housing.This article reviews the parallel history of each concerning urban redevelopment,describing several ke programs.The authors suggests that in four

文档评论(0)

基本资料 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档