张翅-中美污水项目债券融资结构比较研究.pdfVIP

ltft ru,E+iË (Ë#t+e1þÊwã., JLH looos4) ltÊ sl jåqxf t-ñ Ast+ù*4:,i ly-4. a 4fr à,#rtuftÆltJit-4îtw*.ffi ,qnñAiî7y4 a 4fr *.#èFltà ì4,il,/Èir+þ4#.+iñ*14+,ë*,h\lftvu,+í*,nñ4f-eÈfrÆ+4v|4\#4ÈM+ñfÈ EÈE*-â iî1Y-4frv:¡4.âùkiå-àÈ9-!-++#r,9.-nåÅtùÌ,tÈè+88lå,+R-ù,?kìt-iîly-f,a4fr^*ìàJ#r*1 È L, u\ ffiå á\. E +t È â4r,6 7Y 4 A 4fr # F ÌZt k1 È- àå t*#Ìrf,l ffi # ;ú r1{4 H t-fuft Æ M t*Irl ;ùtÈ.ffi n ^* ^lÍ analysis of typical bonds financing structure for wastew- Abstrach The paper develops an in-depth comparison and ater projects in China and the USA, based on two samples taken from each country. Characteristics of covenant pro- visions, cash flows and guarantees have been closely examined in order to unveil both the advantages and inherent financial risks of the hvo structures. The revenue-supported structure from the USA sets a good example for China to develop its nascent project bond market. Key words: bond; wastewater projeci; financing structure; case study; comparative study I+Hâæ€l F4o7.e. tf ffi+niRrgl B t*ËÆË] 1002-851X(2010)05-001e-04 )-/( fLËrF E lt å !fi È Ëru iqÈE Ét - I É grEFl*ß I Ëffi os FrlfiÉä€ffirÌffi â, xf T¿tÉfr È4Ê. ïËÈE RÉ)ÉEËË-ËÉgÈx. ffi)Ëzj¡ñ wn!âtLÃx.rF E E 4ttrK..littåÉffiËffill. 1.1 ,fË#ffiiô l^ *t3li ä*Ðíft +, iÉHlilÈxFÏ å TåH{ñ É! rEH. trÉË ù â€Ëfr È t\ñfr k-ñ a ( È.rf ÊFfrã þ\ fr E 1ãñ{4ft! ÊtH É! õËÍ)Ã^, N+rF E H{ñ{Ë* É! å+* trä-ô)tt )T zoos + 8 tr zs â^frkft 7 10 +EEô!L ìf ú*È*ru ø , rF E iÈr Ê, É +- É! ñtfttúllkxøWl