试从军事战略的调整分析美国在中亚的略走势.doc

试从军事战略的调整分析美国在中亚的战略走势?The Future Strategy Analyses of US to Central Asia Based on Military Affairs （这个是我根据你的题目翻译的） 第一篇：U.S. – CENTRAL ASIAN RELATIONS: GOING BEYOND AFGHANISTAN By Roman Muzalevsky (01/20/2010 issue of the CACI Analyst) /?q=node/5252 The recent U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee Hearing on Central Asian Affairs affirmed the significance of Central Asia for U.S. regional and global security interests. Even more so, it pointed to efforts of the U.S. government to link its faltering Afghanistan-Pakistan strategy with what it hopes will be a more robust regional policy toward Central Asia and the region more broadly. However, these dynamics appear to be primarily driven by the U.S. need to finish its “business” in the Afghanistan-Pakistan border areas rather than by the potential of the U.S.-Central Asian cooperation in its own right.BACKGROUND: Held on 15 December 2009, the hearing came two weeks after U.S. President Obama announced plans to deploy 30,000 additional U.S. troops in Afghanistan and conclude the military campaign by 2011. The hearing, centered on testimonies of Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs George Krol, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Afghanistan, Pakistan and Central Asia David Sedney, and local experts, painted two divergent but co-existing realities: Central Asia is important to U.S. regional and global security interests, but no corresponding level of regional engagement has been pursued, let alone achieved, to fully utilize the capacity of U.S.-Central Asian relations.Indeed, Central Asia is critical for long-term U.S. interests in maintaining a balance of power in Eurasia and integrating some of the Eurasian sub-regions into global economic frameworks. The region can also better support U.S. objectives of defeating Al-Qaida, weakening jihadist networks, and diversifying energy sources and transit routes. Kroll seems to share this view, but necessary resources to do the j