GRE ARGUE 模板改进版推荐.docVIP

HEAD In this argument, the arguer concludes/recommends/advocates that will lead to . To support/justify the conclusion/claim, the arguer points out/claims that . In addition, the arguer reasons that . The argument suffers from several critical fallacies. BODY 小推大 An additional reasoning flaw in the argument is the arguer’s underlying assumption that are representative of all . However, only is rarely sufficient to establish a general conclusion that . Therefore, I cannot accept the arguer’s generalization about . 大推小 The arguer commits a fallacy of “misapplied generalization” in assuming that applies specifically to . Lacking the evidence that reflects the general , the arguer cannot justify his recommendation based on the nationwide survey. 原因过简： The arguer commits a fallacy of causal oversimplification in assuming that . While A is an important element in deterring B, it is highly possible other fact may have contributed to B. For instance, . And the arguer neglects the fact , without ruling out these and other possible facts, the arguer could not safely draw any significant conclusion or prediction. 相同或同时的关系误认为是因果关系： The arguer uses the positive correlation between A and B to establish causality. However, the fact that A coincide with B does not necessary prove that A caused. The arguer has not ruled out other possible causes for B, such as could be responsible for B. 错误类比： Analogies draw between A and B are highly suspect because there are many serious differences. For instance, . Although there are points of comparison between A and B, but apparently, differences between A and B clearly outweigh the surface similarities. Thus, it is impossible to conclude that . 忽略时间地点的不同： The arguer assumes without justification that the background conditions have remain the same at the different times and different locations. Thus, it is impossible to conclude that . 非此即彼： The arguer’s recommendatio