雅思table小作文范文总结.docVIP

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Family typeProportion of people from each household type living in povertySingle aged person6% (54,000)Aged couple4% (48,000)Single, no children19% (359,000)Couple, no children7% (211,000)Sole parent21% (232,000)Couple with children12% (933,000)All households11% (1,837,000)The table here depicted about the proportion of different type of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. Total 1,837,000 poor families has been selected in this study which is 11% of the total, varies from Aged family, no children family to families with children. From the table, we can see clearly that the highest proportion group is the family with children---what is more, the sole parent, 21% , about 232,000 families is on the first place. While couple with children, 12%, 933,000 is followed. The Second higher group is families without children, from which single families without children is the most serious one --19% , 359,000 families and couple without children seems better , only 7% about 211,000 families. And the smallest group should be the aged families which total is only 10%, among which single aged person is 6%, two percent higher than the aged couple. Based on the data the table provided and what we analyzed above, we can draw the conclusion that Having children is the most crucial reason for being poor while aged is the less crucial one. First, the subway systems in the six cities were opened in time sequence with London being the earliest (in 1863) and Los Angeles the latest ( in 2001 ). The underground railway system had their prime time in the 20th century, which saw the construction of 4 underground railway systems respectively in Paris (1900), in Tokyo (1927), in Washington DC (1976), and in Los Angeles (1981). Second, seen