《论我国民事诉讼缺席判决制度》.docVIP

本科毕业论文（设计） 论文（设计）题目： 论我国民事诉讼缺席判决制度 学 院： 法 学 院 专 业： 法 学 班 级： 学 号： 学生姓名： 指导教师： 2008年6月20日 xxx大学本科毕业论文（设计） 诚信责任书 本人郑重声明：本人所呈交的毕业论文（设计），是在导师的指导下独立进行研究所完成。毕业论文（设计）中凡引用他人已经发表或未发表的成果、数据、观点等，均已明确注明出处。 特此声明。 论文（设计）作者签名： 日 期： 目 录 摘要································································Ⅱ Abstract···························································Ⅲ 前言································································1 一、缺席的含义及界定··············································1 二、缺席判决的历史研究··········································2 三、两种基本模式的分析··········································2 （一）缺席判决主义模式··········································2 （二）一方辩论判决主义模式·····································3 四、我国民事诉讼缺席判决制度的内容、特点及缺陷 ··················4 （一）我国缺席判决制度的内容································4 （二）我国缺席判决制度的特点·································5 （三）我国缺席判决制度的缺陷·································6 五、我国民事诉讼缺席判决制度的完善······························8 （一）细化缺席判决条件·······································8 （二）坚持平等对待原被告原则·································9 （三）对缺席情形的充实··········································9 （四）诉讼模式向当事人主义转换·································9 （五）完善缺席判决当事人的救济途径·····························9 结 语····························································11 参考文献·························································12 致 谢····························································13 摘 要 缺席判决制度由来已久，是民事诉讼中的一种重要制度，经过长期的发展在国际上形成了两种模式，即缺席判决主义模式和一方辩论判决主义模式。西方大多国家的缺席判决制度都选择了其中之一。我国民事诉讼的缺席判决制度不属于两种模式的任何一种，而是具有自己的特点。但无论是我国还是世界其他国家，缺席判决制度都还存在较多的缺陷。国外学者对这一制度的研究已有相当历史，其国家的缺席判决制度也得到了很好的完善，我国对缺席判决制度的研究起步较晚，但随着社会的进步，越来越多的学者投入到这一制度的研究中来，并取得了可喜成果。本文将对缺席判决制度的起源、发展和国际社会的两大缺席判决模式进行一些阐述分析，但主要还是从我国民事诉讼的内容、特点、缺陷方面分析缺席判决制度，并寻找完善这一制度的方法。 关键词：缺席判决制度，缺陷，完善 Default judgement On Chinas system of civil lawsuit Abstract Default judgement is a long-standing system