- 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
原发性下肢深静脉瓣膜功能不全手术方法选择
原发性下肢深静脉瓣膜功能不全手术方法选择 作者:陈辉,张方,王天佑,陈学明,许晓航,陈福森 【摘要】 目的 观察不同手术方法治疗原发性下肢深静脉瓣膜功能不全的疗效。方法 150例(240条肢体)经顺行静脉造影证实为原发性下肢深静脉瓣膜功能不全的患者分为A、B、C 3组,每组80条患肢。A组行股浅静脉瓣膜外戴戒术,B组行股浅静脉瓣膜外修补术,C组行腘静脉半腱肌-股二头肌肌襻代瓣膜术,3组均同时行大隐静脉高位结扎剥脱术加交通支结扎术。以CEAP临床分级与临床记分评价疗效。结果 3组术后临床记分呈不同程度下降:A组中C2~C4者手术效果较好;B组中C2~C5者手术效果较好;C组中C2~C6者手术效果较好;A、B、C 3组手术效果比较,对C2~C4者,3组无明显差异;对C5者,B、C组无明显差异,但A组效果较差;对C6者,C组效果较好,但A、B组效果较差。结论 原发性股浅静脉瓣膜功能不全的手术治疗,应依据深静脉瓣膜功能不全的程度决定手术方式。 【关键词】 原发性股浅静脉瓣膜功能不全;瓣膜外戴戒术;瓣膜外修补术;腘静脉半腱肌-股二头肌肌襻代瓣膜术 The selection for operation method in treatment of primary deep venous insufficiency 【Abstract】 Objective To observe the therapeutic effect of different operation methods in the treatment of primary deep venous insufficiency (PDVI).Methods Two hundred and forty lower limbs in one hundred and fifty patients who were proved to be PDVI by ascending venography were divided into Group A(80 limbs),Group B(80 limbs) and Group C(80 limbs).Patients of Group A were treated with the encircling constriction of venous wall at the first valve of superficial femoral veins.Patients of Group B were treated with the surgical repair outside the incompetent valve of superficial femoral veins.Patients of Group C were treated with the semitendinosus-biceps femoris substitute valve operation outside the popliteal vein.And they were also treated with the high ligation and ablation of great saphenous vein,ablation of superficial veins and ligation of perforator veins at the same time.Ascending CEAP classification and clinical scoring were proceeded from two months to six years after operation to evaluate the effect of the operation.Results The difference between preoperative and postoperative scores of Group A,Group B and Group C were remarkable(Group A,P<0.01;Group B,P<0.01;Group C,P<0.01).To C2~C4,there were no apparent difference among three groups.To C5,the therapeutic effect of Group A was bad.To C6,the therapeutic effect of Group C was fairly good.Conclusion The selection for operation method in the treatment
有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站
文档评论(0)