为什么《dive-into-python》不值得推荐（Why isnt dive-into-python worth recommending）.docVIP

下载本文档

13
0
约8.94千字
约 7页
2017-09-06 发布于河南
举报
版权申诉

为什么《dive-into-python》不值得推荐（Why isnt dive-into-python worth recommending）.doc

1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

为什么《dive-into-python》不值得推荐（Why isnt dive-into-python worth recommending）

为什么《dive-into-python》不值得推荐（Why isnt dive-into-python worth recommending） Why Dive into Python is not worth recommending, why Dive into Python is not worth recommending? May 5, 2010 update: I translated an article Dive Into Python feisibuke as further support for this view and reply to comments, see: /lanphaday/archive/2010/05/05/5558617.aspx Dive into Python why not recommended by Lai Yonghao (/lanphaday) Whether it is in China the most popular Python python-cn Google Group community, or in the CSDN script, all from time to time to join the new friend consulting have what good books Python, reply post, definitely not Dive into Python (hereinafter abbreviated as DIP, and Book). Today I want to say is it not recommended reason: its too old, but rather odd content arrangement, the lack of overall view point of view, I dont see that on its entry, and finally there is a very important point to — — recommendation may not use Python at work. Based on the older version, in the first chapter, we can see that this book is written in Python 2.2 or 2.3. The Python release of the latest version 2.5.2, 2.6/3.0 version also plans to release in October this year, the separated version is too large, the performance of recommendation for the encoding form, many books are no longer valid. In fact, the author of this book was not updated in 2004, and after four years, for an open source scripting language, the changes could be described in terms of mountains and rivers. In manuals, you can see many features are added new, in, 2.3/2.4/2.5 footnote, not to mention that DIP is out of date. For example, when I write this article, I refer to the DIP 5.4b version of the woodpecker website (/diveintopython/index.html), which is the latest Chinese version of DIP. Among the second chapters are example 2.1, as follows: There are at least two failed to make full use of the new version, one is the definition of myParams, continuation character code to become ugly, another is join () function argu