Chinese compound word structure and syntactic structure of the similarities and differences between their underlying causes（汉语复合词结构和句法结构异同的根本原因）.doc

Chinese compound word structure and syntactic structure of the similarities and differences between their underlying causes On how to look at the problem of the relationship between structure and syntactic structure of Chinese compound words, long-term view of scholars is not exactly the same, or different emphases. Many scholars, such as Professor L? Zhu Dexi (1952, [12] 28 Lu Zhiwei (1964 [11] 2. Zhao (1968, [21] 328-329 Ren Xueliang (1981, [14] 134-135 Zhu Dexi (1982, [25] 32 Huang Borong East Liao Xu (2007 [6], to note The consistency between the two, so that Chinese compound word structure and syntactic structure is basically the same, with reference to the syntactic structure to analyze the structure of a compound word some scholars to note the difference between the two is more, pointed out that the Chinese compound word structure and syntactic structure different phenomena (1), such as Dai Zhaoming (1988 pointed out that there are some syntactic structure in the form compound words in the Chinese, the structure and function of compound words also far less syntactic structure as consistent [1] Zhou Jian (1991,1992,2004 that the composition of Chinese compound words by the syntactic structure mode, but also pointed out that the the mire compound word Chinese syntactic structure of relations can not be applied to explain the so-called “Italian” and “reverse composite word”, [22, 23], [23 ] 96,119,145-146 Wang Ning (2008, essentially the same view of word formation and structure sentence questioned, that the Chinese word formation has a very obvious non-syntactic features “to the sentence of the law lexical often difficult to make an accurate interpretation of the compound word meaning. 19] In our view, the Chinese compound word structure and syntactic structure of both consistency, there are differences, so no matter emphasized both the same, or emphasize the differences and the two different emphases probably just concerned about the paper to focus on is t