- 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
人工流产术妇女术前焦虑研究及护理干预
人工流产术妇女术前焦虑研究及护理干预[摘要] 目的 分析接受人工流产术妇女的术前焦虑情况,评估护理干预对术前焦虑的影响。 方法 选取我服务站120例施行人工流产术的孕妇,将其随机分为观察组和对照组,每组各60例。在术前30 min和护理干预后分别用焦虑自评量表评估孕妇的焦虑程度,分析干预前后焦虑评分的变化和术中的疼痛程度。 结果 在干预前,观察组和对照组的焦虑评分比较差异无统计学意义(t = 0.841 4,P > 0.05)。术后1周观察组的焦虑评分为(36.5±8.7)分,明显比对照组低(t = 3.907 1,P < 0.01);干预前后观察组的焦虑评分差值为(7.8±3.5)分,显著高于对照组的(3.1±2.7)分(t = 8.235 9,P < 0.05);观察组术中轻度疼痛占81.67%,远高于对照组的61.67%(χ2=5.909 7,P < 0.05)。 结论 由于各种因素的影响,选择人工流产术的妇女有不同程度的焦虑心理,需要采用护理干预,缓解焦虑,帮助手术的顺利进行和受术者的康复。
[关键词] 人工流产;护理;焦虑
[中图分类号] R473.71 [文献标识码] C [文章编号] 1673-7210(2012)08(b)-0134-02
Analysis of preoperative anxiety on women undergoing induced abortion and relevant nursing intervention
LIU Shuyu
Family Planning Service Station of Liuting Street of Chengyang District in Qingdao City, Shandong Province, Qingdao 266018, China
[Abstract] Objective To analyze the preoperative anxiety of women undergoing induced abortion and to assess the influence of nursing intervention on preoperative anxiety. Methods A total of 120 pregnant women undergoing induced abortion were randomly divided into observation group and control group, each group had 60 cases. The anxiety degrees 30 minutes before surgery and after nursing intervention were measured using the self-rating anxiety scale. The changes of anxiety scores before and after intervention and intraoperative pain degrees were analyzed. Results Before intervention, the anxiety scores of the observation group and the control group were not significantly different (t = 0.841 4, P 0.05). One week after the surgery, the anxiety score of the observation group was (36.5±8.7) scores, which was significantly lower than that of the control group (t = 3.907 1, P 0.01); the difference in anxiety degree between before and after intervention was (7.8±3.5) scores, which was significantly higher than the (3.1±2.7) scores of the control group (t = 8.235 9, P 0.05); during the surgery, mild pain of the observation group accounted for 81.67%, which was far higher than the 61.67% of the
文档评论(0)