- 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Comparison of SUSY mass spectrum calculations
a
r
X
i
v
:
h
e
p
-
p
h
/
0
2
0
7
3
1
4
v
1
2
5
J
u
l
2
0
0
2
Comparison of SUSY mass spectrum calculations
B. Allanach, S. Kraml,1 W. Porod
Abstract
We provide a comparison of the results of four SUSY mass spectrum calculations
in mSUGRA: Isajet, SuSpect, SoftSusy, and SPheno. In particular, we focus on the
high tanβ and focus point regions, where the differences in the results are known
to be large.
Contribution to SUSY02, 10th International Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification
of Fundamental Interactions, 17–23 June 2002, DESY Hamburg, Germany.
1 Introduction
Many SUSY studies rely on computer codes that calculate the mass spectrum of the
minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM), the couplings, branching ratios, etc.,
from given sets of model parameters. For the LHC, for instance, many simulations are
done for particular benchmark scenarios or by mapping the (m0, m1/2) parameter plane.
For such studies it is certainly important wheather a particular decay channel is open
or not and what branching ratio it has. Also, theoretically or experimentally excluded
regions depend on the details of the spectrum. Studies for an e+e? Linear Collider deal, in
addition, with high precision measurements of (s)particle properties, with the determina-
tion of the underlying SUSY breaking parameters, their extrapolation to the GUT scale,
model destinction, etc. Experimental accuracies of the per-cent or even per-mille level are
expected. It is thus clear that we need theoretical predictions of a precision comparable
to the experimental accuracy. However, it has been noticed [1, 2] that different programs
can give quite different results for the same set of input parameters.
In this article, we compare the mass spectrum calculations of four public codes:
Isajet 7.63 [3], SuSpect 2.005 [4], SoftSusy 1.4 [5], and SPheno 1.0 [6], in the minimal su-
pergravity (mSUGRA) framework. We discuss the renormalization group (RG) running
and the implementation of radiative corre
您可能关注的文档
- Cartography with Accelerators Locating Fermions in Extra Dimensions at Future Lepton Collid.pdf
- Case 1-Leadership Development Strategy.pdf
- Case Study CTTS - Milestone 04 Data Modeling Solution.doc
- Case Study Research.pptx
- Case-based Adaptations in Medicine Focusing on Hypothyroidism.pdf
- Case-Based Reasoning for Antibiotics Therapy Advice.pdf
- Castor_Camber_Kingpin.pdf
- CatalogMailOrder2011.pdf
- Catering Service.pdf
- Causal discovery from changes.pdf
- Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms.ppt
- Comparison of the $pi$ and $Delta$ operator approximations for the two-dimensional t-J mode.pdf
- Comparison of Structures and Properties between Wooland Ramie Fibers Treated by Atmospheric Pressure.pdf
- Comparison of the Cost Metrics through Investigation of the Relation between Optimal NCV an.pdf
- COMPARISON OF THE GROWTH OF LACTOBACILLUS.pdf
- Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of piperacillin and sulbactam during intermittent.pdf
- Comparison of the photoemission behaviour.pdf
- Comparison of the ride performance of an integrated suspension model.pdf
- Comparison of the volatile compounds of crude and.pdf
- Comparison of the strength and durability performance.pdf
文档评论(0)