An approach for reconciling different perspectives and stakeholder views on risk ranking.pdfVIP

下载本文档

5
0
约7.9万字
约 14页
2017-03-16 发布于天津
举报
版权申诉

An approach for reconciling different perspectives and stakeholder views on risk ranking.pdf

1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

An approach for reconciling different perspectives and stakeholder views on risk ranking.pdf

Journal of Cleaner Production 149 (2017) 1219e1232 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Cleaner Production journal homepage: /locate/jclepro An approach for reconciling different perspectives and stakeholder views on risk ranking Floris Goerlandt a, b, *, Genserik Reniers b, c, d a Aalto University, School of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Marine Technology, Research Group on Maritime Risk and Safety, P.O. Box 14300, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland b KU Leuven, Campus Brussels, Faculty of Economics and Organizational Sciences, Center for Economics and Corporate Sustainability, Warmoesberg 26, 1000 Brussels, Belgium c UAntwerpen, City Campus, Faculty of Applied Economic Sciences, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium d TU Delft, Safety and Security Science Group, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Jaffalaan 5, 2628 BX Delft, The Netherlands article info Article history: Received 24 June 2016 Received in revised form 19 January 2017 Accepted 17 February 2017 Available online 23 February 2017 Keywords: Risk ranking Expected value Uncertainty Moral considerations Foundational issues abstract Risk ranking is a widely used technique for selecting and prioritizing multiple risks facing an organization or decision maker. In industrial practice and in academic work, risk ranking methods are commonly based an implicit risk conceptualization, adopting a particular foundational perspective and accounting for selected factors. Nevertheless, different stakeholders may adhere to various risk conceptualizations, applying different foundational perspectives and accounting for different factors in the ranking process. Identifying a gap in the literature to coherently consider these different foundations, this paper presents an approach for reconciling different foundational perspectives and stakeholder views, accounting for uncertainties about these. The approach is presented based on three foundational perspectives (the expected value, uncertai