交通肇事逃逸致人死亡的定性分析.docxVIP

PAGE 1 - PAGE 4 - 摘 要 我国市场经济一直在持续飞速地前进，交通设施的发展变化也非常迅速，各种车辆如雨后春笋般涌现，汽车也渐渐成为大家的代步工具，只是大量的交通惨案也逐渐涌现，造成的不良影响也越来越大，这种严重的社会现象逐渐形成后，已经引起了整个社会的密切关心。这样一来，一些本来有生存机会的人会因不能立刻被抢救而死亡。为了维护被害人的生命权或者财产权，也为了能够更加有效地究查行为人的刑事责任，1997年刑法在1979年刑法的基础上又增加了“因逃逸致人死亡”这种结果加重犯的规定。随后，一些相应的司法解释也逐渐出台，为司法实务作出进一步的规范与指导。尽管立法与司法解释方面有了理论上的进步，可是司法实践中仍存在很多争议。 为了切实保护相关当事人的切身利益，也为了案件能够得到公平公正地处理，司法机关必须弄清楚交通肇事罪“因逃逸致人死亡”的内涵与不作为故意杀人罪的内涵，两者之间的区别与定罪边界也必须被弄清楚，本文通过最高人民法院公布的刑事指导第220号案例，对二者进行了学理分析并作出对比。本文分成五个部分：第一部分是案情介绍与案件争议的核心焦点；第二部分则阐述了对“因逃逸致人死亡”四种不同的理解，及相应的学理分析和本文自己的理解；第三部分是不作为故意杀人罪的学理分析；第四部分主要是明确区分“因逃逸致人死亡”与不作为故意杀人罪，阐述两者的相同之处与差异；第五部分是案例分析与结论，倪某的行为构成交通肇事罪，且具有交通肇事后逃逸的加重情节，其行为不符合不作为故意杀人罪的构成要件。 关键词：交通肇事；逃逸致人死亡；故意杀人 PAGE 1 - PAGE 4 - Abstract With the rapid and continuing development of Chinese market economy, the construction of traffic infrastructure is developing rapidly, with all kinds of vehicles increasing. Cars have become common goods in each family. But traffic accident cases emerge in an endless stream, which has become a serious social problem, arousing widespread concern in society. What’s worse, some peace-breakers, in order to avoid penalty, even drove away after the accident. So many victims who could have survived died due to lack of timely rescue. In order to protect the victims and further related responsibilities effectively, the criminal law of 1997 has added the aggravating punishment of traffic offences based on the criminal law in 1979. An explanation has made explanation, to further regulate the traffic accident crime. But there’s still a lot of controversy in the judicial practice. In order to correctly handle the escape after traffic accident and tell the difference between death caused by hit-and-run and intentional homicide, this article, from the analysis on the nature and the constitutive requirements, makes a comparison, respectively in death caused by hit-and-run and intentional homicide, based on the 220th criminal guide case ann