检察环节非法证据排除规则分析-法律学专业论文.docxVIP

检察环节非法证据排除规则研究中文摘要 检察环节非法证据排除规则研究 中文摘要 Ab AbstractA Research on How to Review Evidence’s Admissibility by Police’s Illegal Conduct in Proceeding of Public Prosecution I I II II 检察环节非法证据排除规则研究 中文摘要 非法证据排除规则通常指执法人员及其授权的人员通过非法的方法所收集的证 据不得在刑事审判中采纳。非法证据排除规则主要功能为遏制侦查机关非法取证行为 和保障刑事被告公平受审。非法证据排除规则早已被联合国司法文件及各国刑事诉讼 立法所确立。在我国，非法证据排除规则尽管先后在司法解释、新修改的《刑事诉讼 法》第五章中予以规定，但是非法证据排除的内容规定得过于原则抽象，且在检察环 节没有相应的关于非法证据排除规则的操作程序。自修改后的刑诉法颁布后，最高人 民检察院修订了《人民检察院刑事诉讼规则》，就检察院如何适用非法证据排除规则 作了比较详细的规定，但该规定过于原则粗疏，操作性不强。我国检察机关不仅承担 起诉职能，还承担监督侦查行为等法律监督职能。检察机关所承担的批捕、起诉职能 决定了检察机关应当审查证据的合法性，从而把非法证据排除在法庭审理之外，而检 察机关的法律监督职能更要求检察机关对非法取证的人员进行处理，所以，检察机关 在实施非法证据排除规则具有不可或缺的作用，由此研究检察环节非法证据排除规则 和操作程序亦显得尤其必要。笔者作为一名检察机关侦查人员，将以检察机关如何贯 彻落实非法证据排除规则为视角，以所在检察机关办理的案件作为分析的实例，厘清 非法证据与非法证据排除规则，深刻领会非法证据排除规则的内容及特点，认清并找 准非法证据排除规则给检察机关可能带来的挑战与考验，提出建立非法证据排除工作 机制的建议与构想，促进公正司法，维护公平正义。 关键词：检察环节 非法证据排除规则 现实困境 规则完善 作 者：高虹 指导教师：刘磊 A Research on How to Review Evidence’s Admissibility by Police’s Illegal Conduct in Proceeding of Public Prosecution Abstract Exclusionary rule of illegal evidence usually refers to the evidence which collected through illegal methods by law enforcement officers and their authorized personnel can not be adopted in the criminal trial. The main functions of exclusionary rule of illegal evidence are curbing investigation organ’s collection behavior of illegal evidence and protecting criminal defendants from an unfair trial.Exclusionary rule of illegal evidence had already been established by the judicial documents of the United Nation and national criminal procedural legislation. In China, although exclusionary rule of illegal evidence has been stipulated in the judicial interpretation and chapter 5 of “Criminal Procedural Law”which was modified newly, its content is too abstract and rough, and there is no corresponding operating procedures about exclusionary rule of illegal evidence in the link of procuratorial. Since the promulgation of the revised Criminal Procedural Law, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate revise