基于临床路径的优质护理对冠心病患者行冠状动脉支架置入术后康复及并发症发生率的影响.docxVIP

基于临床路径的优质护理对冠心病患者行冠状动脉支架置入术后康复及并发症发生率的影响.docx

  1. 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
基于临床路径的优质护理对冠心病患者行冠状动脉支架置入术后康复及并发症发生率的影响

基于临床路径的优质护理对冠心病患者行冠状动脉支架置入术后康复及并发症发生率的影响   [摘要] 目的 探讨基于临床路径的优质护理对冠心病患者行冠状动脉支架置入术后康复及并发症发生率的影响。 方法 选取XX年4月~XX年6月广元市中心医院心血管内科62例冠心病患者,采用随机数字表法分为对照组与研究组,各31例。对照组采用常规护理干预,研究组在常规护理基础上实施基于临床路径的优质护理。统?对比两组并发症发生率、护理满意度、入院时及护理后左心室射血分数、抑郁评分及焦虑评分变化情况。 结果 护理后两组LVEF较护理前增高,且研究组较对照组高,差异有统计学意义。护理后两组SDS及SAS评分较护理前降低,且研究组较对照组低,差异有统计学意义。研究组桡动脉痉挛率、血肿率、迷走神经反射率、心律失常率较对照组低,差异有统计学意义。两组护理总满意度比较,研究组较对照组高,差异有统计学意义。 结论 冠心病患者行冠状动脉支架置入术中采用基于临床路径的优质护理效果显著,可有效促使患者术后心功能恢复,缓解其负性情绪,降低并发症发生率,提高护理满意度,值得推广。   [关键词] 临床路径;优质护理干预;冠心病;冠状动脉支架置入术;术后康复;并发症   [中图分类号] [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673--0177-04   [Abstract] Objective To explore the effect of quality nursing based on clinical pathways on the incidence of rehabilitation and complication after coronary artery stenting in patients with coronary heart disease. Methods From April XX to June XX, 62 patients with coronary heart disease in the department of cardiology of Guangyuan Central Hospital were randomly divided into control group and study group, 31 cases in each group. The control group was treated by routine nursing, and the study group carried out quality nursing based on clinical path on the basis of routine nursing. The incidence of complications, nursing satisfaction, left ventricular ejection fraction , depression score and anxiety score at the time of admission and after care were compared. Results After treatment, the LVEF of the two groups increased significantly than before care, and the study group was higher than the control group, the difference was statistically significant . After treatment, the SDS and SAS scores of the two groups were lower than those before treatment, and the study group was lower than the control group, the difference was statistically significant . The rate of radial spasm, the hematoma, the vagal reflex and the arrhythmia in the study group was lower than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant . The overall satisfaction of the study group was higher than that of the control group, the

文档评论(0)

manyu + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档