国家主权与边疆治理：中国边疆地区行政建制改革分析-state sovereignty and border governance an analysis of administrative system reform in chinas border areas.docxVIP

国家主权与边疆治理：中国边疆地区行政建制改革研究国家主权与边疆治理：中国边疆地区行政建制改革研究with the frontier regulation. The result was the formation of the heavy land of Xinjiang Light territory, heavy political and business situation in light of economic development. The rule of man as the characteristics of feudal society, to perceive of national sovereignty embodied in the Qing period only.The third part is the status of frontier region of the administration and organizational system. At present, a total of 6 kinds of Administration and organizational system in the frontier region which is county, township, town establishment, an agency, branch offices, institutions, Production and Construction Corps,. The administration and organizational system led to frontier region has a wide range of administration and organizational system, and organizational system not highlight the main features, too much management level of the three major problems.The fourth part is to analyze the case which of the administration and organizational system in the frontier region. Sansha city、Yining Border Economic Cooperation Zone、Yu Mai village which chosen to be an example. These three areas are reflected in three different situations: Sansha city reflected national sovereignty; Yining Border Economic Cooperation Zone is mainly reflected the frontier regulation; Yu Mai village not only reflected the frontier of national sovereignty but also reflected management. Specifically, set the administrative establishment of the three regions that may have the following problems: the administration and organizational system does not match with the actual; the administration and organizational system set up contrary to the relevant law; administration and organizational system settings may cause confusion in Chinas administrative bodies.The fifth part is the forecast of administration and organizational system set up in frontier region. This paper insists that the Special Administrative Region is not a suitable establishment of general a