Application of Logic Modeling Processes to Explore Theor：逻辑建模中的应用过程的探索研究.pptVIP

下载本文档

2
0
约2.1千字
约 13页
2018-06-24 发布于四川
举报
版权申诉

Application of Logic Modeling Processes to Explore Theor：逻辑建模中的应用过程的探索研究.ppt

1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Application of Logic Modeling Processes to Explore Theor：逻辑建模中的应用过程的探索研究

November 4, 2000 American Evaluation Association November 4, 2000 Millett, Dodson, Phillips--American Evaluation Association Application of Logic Modeling Processes to Explore Theory of Change from Diverse Cultural Perspectives Ricardo Millett, Sharon Dodson, Cynthia Phillips American Evaluation Association November 4, 2000 Whose Logic Model …and for Whom? Logic Models Are Subjective “Since the measuring device has been constructed by the observer..we have to remember that what we observe is not nature itself but nature exposed to our method of questioning” Heisenberg “We see things not as they are, but as we are….” Anais Nin Common Issues Encountered “too linear…” “too limited…” “…constraining” “doesn’t capture complexity…” “…nuances are lost” “too graphic…” “needs more specific details…” “…connections are not clear enough…” “not evaluable…” Reflection Activity 1 What are some of the distinguishing characteristics of each model? Strengths, limitations? Utility? Model1 Model2 Model3 Model4 Ways of Showing—Logic Models Epistemic Style (Draze, 2000) Ways of Knowing--Epistemology Conclusion--Locus for Growth If the audiences of evaluation were more consistently understood and the range of assumptions respected would interpretation and use of logic models change? The key is to be conscious of our theories in use and be aware of how they are influencing our observations of the world. * * MODEL 4 idea mapping MODEL 3 theory testing Non-linear (Asynchrony) MODEL 2 idea mapping MODEL 1 theory testing Linear (Synchrony) Non-Causal (Contribution) Causal (Attribution) Theory testing Theory mapping Theory generating Theory and Practice Outcomes Process and outcomes Process Evaluation Focus Logical, precise, analytic Pattern depends on situation and context Intuitive, sense making, ambiguous Attitude Toward Data Educator Facilitator Change Agent Theory of Action Rational Eclectic Metaphoric MODEL 4 MODEL 3 Non-linear (Asynchrony) MODEL 2 MODEL 1 Linear (Synchro