央视“五问食品安全新政”.pptVIP

Design Excellence AE Evaluation Process Stage 1 – Lead Designer Qualifications Stage 2 – Team Qualifications Interview Stage 2 – The Charrette Option Stage 3 – Vision Competition Option “Design Excellence Policies Procedures” Stage 1: Lead Designer Qualifications Stage 1 – Submittal Requirements Cover Letter Lead Design Firm Qualifications Package Design Firm’s Past Performance Philosophy Design Intent Lead Designer’s Portfolio Lead Designer’s Profile SF330 Lead Design Firm Only Helpful Hints… … Stage 1 Qualifications Submittal A/E Evaluation Board Board Members (voting) GSA Regional Architect GSA Regional Engineer GSA OCA Architect or Engineer Private Sector Peer Professional Customer Representative Technical Advisors (non-voting) Project Manager Contracting Officer Customer Technical Rep. Stage 1: Evaluation Criteria Stage 1 – The Shortlist Process CO announces shortlist in FBO Notification Letters sent to all Firms Shortlisted Firms receive Letter of Instruction Interview Date/Time Evaluation Factors for Stage 2 Stage 2 Submittal Requirements (Full SF 330) Shortlisted Firm assemble full Project Team Stage 2: Project Team Qualifications  Interview Stage 2 – Submittals Interview Submit SF 330 – Full Project Team Information Project Team Interview Conducted at GSA Regional Office Key Members of Project Design Team Same A/E Evaluation Board from Stage 1 45 minute presentation, 30 minutes QA Helpful Hints… … Stage 2 Interviews Stage 2: Evaluation Criteria Stage 2 – The Charrette Option Stage 3: Vision Competition Stage 3 – Vision Competitions Evaluation Board Final Recommendation Evaluation Board uses information from all Stages to come to consensus and make Final Recommendation. Recommendation takes the form of a ranking of the teams which is sent to GSA Contacting Officer Project Manager to begin negotiations with top ranked firm. Negotiations Award Final Selection Decision Selection Authority Reviews Recommendations of the Eval