互联网领域滥用市场支配地位的法律分析——兼评360诉腾讯案一审判决internet abuse of dominant market position in the field of legal analysis, and evaluation of 360 v tencent the first-instance judgment.pdfVIP

下载本文档

17
0
约4.33万字
约 38页
2017-12-13 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

互联网领域滥用市场支配地位的法律分析——兼评360诉腾讯案一审判决internet abuse of dominant market position in the field of legal analysis, and evaluation of 360 v tencent the first-instance judgment.pdf

1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

互联网领域滥用市场支配地位的法律分析——兼评360诉腾讯案一审判决internet abuse of dominant market position in the field of legal analysis, and evaluation of 360 v tencent the first-instance judgment

Abstract Since the battle between QQ and Qihoo360 broke out in 2010, there are consistent conflicts between Tencent and Qihoo360,who filed lawsuits against each other.Among them,in November 2011, Qihoo360 brought a lawsuit to The High People’s Court of Guangdong Province (hereinafter,referred to as “GDHC”) for Tencent’s abuse of dominant position in market,which push the dispute to the new high. In 2013, DGHC made the Judgment of first instance and it refused all the claims of the plaintiff,so Tencent won the case.The first trial of GDHC has been caused wide discussion in academia and practical circle on antimonopoly issues in the field of Internet. Avail myself of this opportunity,this paper is started with the general theories of anti-monopoly,then to make new considerations to these general theories by combining the particularity of the Internet.Next step is to have a further study of the reasons and points of the Judgment of GDHC and a analysis on the dispute focus in this case by applying the new considerations. Finally,in-depth probing some of the general theoretical points in order to be able to solve the problems of anti-monopoly in the field of Internet in law enforcement and application in the future.The full text is divided into four parts,the specific contents are as follows: The first part is the case and dispute focus: Simple introduce disputes between Qihoo360 and Tencent;An overview of the Judgment of the first instance of GDHC;Conclude some important dispute focus and theoretical points. The second part is the relevant market theory in the field of Internet:(1) Over