不与弗（No and Eph）.docVIP

不与弗（No and Eph） From the perspective of oracle bones, the difference between the words Eph and no in ancient Chinese The difference between the word Eph and no in the ancient Chinese language from the perspective of Oracle Bones Research Fellow There are about 15 negative words in the pre Qin literature. There are 6 inscriptions on oracle bones: No, no, no, no, mother, and death. The study of negative words in ancient Chinese is listed as follows: 1) Ding Xinshu put forward in 1935 no less than not add view, hold this view of Boodbery, Lv Shuxiang, Wang Li, Kennedy, Graham, Mulder and so on. The idea is to combine according to the voice, but in the spring and autumn literature, many examples of Eph modified transitive verbs do not take an object, although as language as a combination of standards, but this does not explain the negative words in sentence usage, can not be said to be a function of meaning together, some people say not in Eph. the way is not suitable for the Oracle, and Jinwen shangshu. In the declarative sentence, modifiers of verbs, adjectives, and words are not interlinked, but the relation between verbs and adjectives is not direct. Can not use the predicate can not do that, at the end of the sentence words, Eph expression, emphasizing the function of this concept is consistent with Gongyangzhuan view. 2) western scholars have also explained this. The following is divided into two parts: tone and emphasis P: lindicatif auxiliaries pwat (general) Eph piwat (emphasis) M: no Miwo command word (general) not miwat (emphasis) 3) Sewugs does not recognize the difference between emphasis and common, and proposes another set of methods: No, not a statement; mother, do not forbid No, mother or intransitive verb; Eph, intransitive verb. 4) Takashima (Takashima Chi) basically obeys the preceding division and adds a new criterion to the control of the actions or actions expressed by the verb. P- does not modify the verb that the merchant cannot control, without