立体的理念与技艺——善正义法律人之关系初探（Three dimensional ideas and skills -- a preliminary study of the relationship between good, justice, law and man）.docVIP

立体的理念与技艺——善正义法律人之关系初探（Three dimensional ideas and skills -- a preliminary study of the relationship between good, justice, law and man） Three dimensional concepts and skills: good, justice and law A probe into the relationship between man and man Abstract: This article through to good, justice, the law, the human four combination discussion, Taking the comparative study of eastern and western law as the research method, this paper reveals that we must insist on Legality in the proof of a case, Rationality, purpose, fact, objectivity, the purpose of law are human, human nature, the background of the case and public opinion, The comprehensive consideration of the public sentiment and the peoples morale and so on, trains the stereoscopic good and fair skills. First, from Platons good What exactly is good? In Platons narrative, good is one and many and Xiang, It is purpose, harmony and idea...... In Platons eyes, good is eternal, It exists in evil and justice, exists in man and thing, and exists in all morality and beauty...... Plato In the world of ideas, various ideas form a ladder, and the idea of good is at the top of the ladder Is the highest idea, but also the root of all other ideas. The idea world is harmonious and orderly The reason for the existence of unity is the original of all the order in the universe, the real world only with the idea Only when the world is in harmony can the greatest justice be achieved. But he goes on to mention that some people are good Injustice. Thus, it seems that in Platons book, good has a mystical color. It seems that people seem to be caught Of course, when Platon tells us that good and justice sometimes conflict, we dont seem to Know what to do: isnt justice good? Why is there a conflict? In fact, I think, This is when we understand things, there is a logical problem: yes means that there is no conflict ? Can justice not be good and conflict with good? Do they also exist dialectical unity? Must we resort to logic even if it re