四维彩超联合促甲状腺激素在诊断甲状腺癌中临床价值.docVIP

四维彩超联合促甲状腺激素在诊断甲状腺癌中临床价值.doc

  1. 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
四维彩超联合促甲状腺激素在诊断甲状腺癌中临床价值

四维彩超联合促甲状腺激素在诊断甲状腺癌中临床价值[摘要] 目的 评价高频彩超联合促甲状腺激素在甲状腺癌诊断中的价值,进一步提高诊断准确率,减少误、漏诊率。 方法 分析2010年1月~2011年12月在我院就诊的甲状腺癌患者45例,将上述患者按照随机对照原则分为A组(25例)和B组(20例),其中A组患者术前进行彩超诊断,B组患者术前进行四维彩超联合促甲状腺激素诊断,对两组患者的诊断率进行比较。 结果 A组患者彩超诊断甲状腺癌14例(56.0%),未能确定良恶性6例(24.0%),误诊为良性病变5例(20.0%)。B组患者四维彩超联合促甲状腺激素诊断甲状腺癌18例(90.0%),未能确定良恶性1例(5.0%),误诊为良性病变1例(5.0%)。两组患者之间诊断率比较,差异具有统计学意义(χ2 = 6.252,P 0.05)。 结论 甲状腺癌的超声表现具有一定的特征性,应用四维彩超联合促甲状腺激素诊断甲状腺癌具有重要的临床价值。 [关键词] 四维彩超;促甲状腺激素;甲状腺癌;诊断 [中图分类号] R736.1 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-7210(2012)07(c)-0098-02 Value of four-dimensional color Doppler ultrasound combined with thyroid stimulating hormonein diagnosis of thyroid cancer GAN Xiaohai ZENG Xianming Department of First Surgery, Qishi Hospital of Dongguan City, Guangdong Province, Dongguan 523500, China [Abstract] Objective To evaluate high frequency ultrasonography combined with TSH in thyroid cancer diagnosis to further improve the accuracy of diagnosis, reduce error and the rate of missed diagnosis. Methods 45 cases patients with thyroid cancer from January 2010 to December 2011 in our hospital were analyzed. The patients according to the random and control principle divided into group A (n = 25) and group B (n = 20). Group A were diagnosed by color Doppler ultrasound before operation, while group B were diagnosed by preoperative four-dimensional color Doppler ultrasound combined with TSH diagnosis. Then compared the diagnosis rate of two groups of patients. Results In the A group, patients with color Doppler ultrasound in diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma were 14 cases (56%). Failing to identify benign and malignant were 6 cases (24%). 5 cases were misdiagnosed as benign lesion (20%). The patients in the B group four-dimensional color Doppler ultrasound combined with TSH in diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma were 18 cases (90%). Failing to identify benign and malignant was 1 case (5%). 1 case was misdiagnosed as benign lesion (5%). There was statistical difference between two groups (χ2 = 6.252, P 0.05). Concl

文档评论(0)

linsspace + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档