物业管理案例：小区停车场丢车赔不赔.docVIP

物业管理案例：小区停车场丢车赔不赔 物业管理案例：小区停车场丢车赔不赔提要：停车丢车案例归纳：1.主管部门核准营业收费的停车场，本身就有保管义务，主管部门检查未有安防、消防措施，不允营业 物业管理案例：小区停车场丢车赔不赔 某小区设有停车场，收费标准略低于指导价，物业管理公司虽在车场安排有保安值班，但为防止突发重大损失，依然在车场入口处用告示牌及在停车费票据上明示：本车场只负责提供车位，收取的仅是车位租金，请车主加强防范措施，车辆被盗受损，本公司概不负责。一次业主甲的朋友乙开车来访，停车于车场，其间下一场暴雨，雨后离开时，发现自己的车辆丢失，遂与物业管理公司交涉要求赔偿，物业管理公司以有正式声明在先，收取的停车费未含看管费为由，拒绝赔偿，乙遂将物业管理公司告上法院。 观点一：声明在先，不予赔偿 理据：已有声明，尽了告示义务，收费低（未含看管费），不存在保管关系，利益风险不等 观点二：单方声明，不予承认。 理据：土地是国家的，收的其实是看管费。收了费，保管关系成立。单方声明，强加于人，不合法理。 观点三：双方有责，各负一半。 观点四：以责定罚 停车丢车案例归纳： 1.主管部门核准营业收费的停车场，本身就有保管义务，主管部门检查未有安防、消防措施，不允营业。 2.物价部门未核准收费标准，收费违法。 3.单独签订特约服务事项，可以免责；单方格式合同无效。 4.有保管表示行为（扣证、换牌、给票据等），牌未丢、票未做记号车丢，需负责任。 5.给人印象明确是无人看管的收费停车场，责任反而小。提供方便的临时停放点，不收费，不看管（最好提醒），丢车可以不赔。 Measures for the routine management of moral education in Middle SchoolsMethod of conventional management of moral education in middle schoolFirst, the guiding ideology:School moral education is an organic whole of the whole education work, always adhere to the school adhere to the moral education, education for this product, and actively promote the quality education, the school building efficient curriculum system of moral education, moral education, improve the sense of attraction and appeal, enhance the moral education work for through and timeliness. Teach everyone, service education and management education, and school moral education work must be with family education and community education closely together, to form a concerted pattern, and strive to create a good atmosphere for education, and to promote the all-round development of students, to establish a scientific moral education full of vigor the For long-term mechanism.Two, the goal of moral education:To guide the students to form the correct world outlook, outlook on life, values, to cultivate students unity and mutual assistance, honest and trustworthy, law-abiding, good quality, hard work, set a good XX students ideological quality, psychological quality and image quali