1-2000-An Experimental comparison of the fairness model.pdfVIP

下载本文档

2
0
约1.81万字
约 8页
2017-04-11 发布于江苏
举报
版权申诉

1-2000-An Experimental comparison of the fairness model.pdf

1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

1-2000-An Experimental comparison of the fairness model

An Experimental Comparison of the Fairness Models by Bolton and Ockenfels and by Fehr and Schmidt¤ Dirk Engelmannyand Martin Strobelz Humboldt-Universit?t zu Berlin January 29, 2000 Abstract In this note we present an experiment to compare the two compet- ing fairness theories by Bolton and Ockenfels and by Fehr and Schmidt. For most experiments that these theories have previously been applied to, they make similar predictions so that it is di￠cult to compare their predictive accuracy. We designed a very simple experiment that induces opposing predictions made by both theories. If the maximiza- tion of total payo¤ is in line with the decision predicted by Fehr and Schmidt, almost all subjects decide accordingly, whereas if it is in line with the prediction by Bolton and Ockenfels, decisions are dispersed. 1 Introduction Attention has recently been drawn to Bolton and Ockenfels’ “Theory of Eq- uity, Reciprocity and Competition” [forthcoming], and Fehr and Schmidt’s “Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation” [1999], in the remain- der of this note denoted by ERC and FS, respectively. Both groups of authors quote an impressive number of experimental results that can be ex- plained by their theories. However, if one wants to compare the predictive ¤We thank Simon G?chter, Wieland Müller and Hans Normann for helpful comments. Financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through Sonderforschungs- bereich 373 and by the Deutsche Girozentrale - Deutsche Kommunalbank is gratefully acknowledged. yInstitut für ?¤entliche Wirtschaft und Wirtschaftspolitik, Humboldt-Universit?t zu Berlin, Spandauer Str. 1, D-10178 Berlin, Germany, FAX: +49-30-2093 5787, phone: +49- 30-2093 5786, e-mail: engelman@wiwi.hu-berlin.de zInstitut für Wirtschaftstheorie III, Humboldt-Universit?t zu Berlin, Spandauer Str. 1, D-10178 Berlin, Germany, FAX: +49-30-2093 5704, phone: +49-30-2093 5724, e-mail: strobel@wiwi.hu-berlin.de 1 power of these two theories, most of the experiments