现行民事诉讼中的调解程序与法官角色.pdfVIP

上海交通大学 硕士学位论文 现行民事诉讼中的调解程序与法官角色 姓名：唐明渠 申请学位级别：硕士 专业：法律 指导教师：杨力 现行民事诉讼中的调解程序与法官角色 摘 要 随着我国社会转型和社会主义司法制度的不断发展，兴起于计划经 济时代的调解制度已不能完全适应日益复杂的经济和社会发展要求，民 事诉讼调解以法官主导调解为核心的一些弊端逐渐显露。调解，作为我 国民事诉讼的“优良传统”和“成功经验”，已失去昔日的光环和荣耀。 如何改造和重兴民事诉讼调解，仅就目前司法资源的配置现状而言，“调 审分离”似为不妥，也不符合效率原则和诉讼经济原则；取消民事诉讼 调解程序也不可取，它是对优秀历史传统的全盘否定，民事诉讼调解有 其存在的历史价值和现实价值；而墨守于现行的民事诉讼调解程序，则 是背离了时代发展的要求。应对艰难的抉择，需要我们进行深入而有益 的探索。本文试从司法实际运作的角度，探索如何在正当性的基础上完 善现行调解程序和调解组织，并寻求法官角色从调解中的主导者向中立 的劝导者转换的合理路径。 关键词：调解程序，法官角色，完善，转换 3 Intercede Program and Role of Judge in Contemporary Civil Action ABSTRACT According to the social transition and judiciary development, the mediatory system which rising in the era of planned economy is not seasoned with the intricate economy and the demand of the social development. The disadvantage of the mediatory system dominated by the judge in the civil action has appeared. The mediatory system, regarded as “excellent tradition” and “successful experience”, loses its glory by degrees. How to rebuild and rebloom the mediatory system in civil action, Based on the collocation of judicial resources at present it se ems that the system of “detached intermediation and trial” is not suitable and tally with the efficient and economical principle in the civil action. Consequently, it is unacceptable to abolish the mediatory system that will leads to entirely negative of the excellent tradition. The mediatory system in the civil action has its own historical and practical