Dynamic contour tonometry vs. non-contact tonometry and their relation with corneal thickness.pdfVIP

Dynamic contour tonometry vs. non-contact tonometry and their relation with corneal thickness.pdf

  1. 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Dynamic contour tonometry vs. non-contact tonometry and their relation with corneal thickness.pdf

Optik 127 (2016) 3912–3917 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Optik journal homepage: www.elsevier.de/ijleo Dynamic contour tonometry vs. non-contact tonometry and their relation with corneal thickness Adriana Bricen? o, David Mas, Begon? a Doménech ? Departamento de óptica, Farmacología y Anatomía, Universidad de Alicante, San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain article info Article history: Received 8 September 2015 Accepted 4 January 2016 Keywords: Intraocular pressure Corneal thickness Dynamic contour tonometry Non-contact tonometry Tonometry correction factors abstract The purpose of this study is to evaluate the concordance between intraocular pressure (IOP) values obtained with a dynamic contour tonometer (DCT) and a non-contact tonometer (NCT) in healthy patients and to investigate the effect of central corneal thickness (CCT) on IOP readings for each of the two measuring systems. The mean IOP yielded by DCT, NCT and corrected non-contact tonometer (CNCT) was 17.1 mmHg, 15.5 mmHg and 12.2 mmHg, respectively. The average CCT was 563.6 ?m and the ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) was 2.8 mmHg. There was a moderate correlation between CCT and CNCT (r = 0.34, p = 0.001), a weak correlation between CCT and DCT (r = 0.03, p = 0.788) and a weak-to-moderate correlation between CCT and NCT (r = 0.27, p = 0.11). The intra-class correlation coef?cient (ICC) was 0.59 for the DCT-vs.-NCT comparison and 0.56 for DCT-vs.-CNCT. The mean difference between the two instruments (DCT/NCT) ranged from 1.62 to 4.47 mmHg. We have shown that non-contact tonometer is signi?cantly more affected by the central corneal thickness than the dynamic contour tonometer and therefore these methods are not interchangeable. ? 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Biomechanical properties of the eye are of fundamental importance for proper model design, planning of surgical intervention, pharmacological interaction or even risk control of ocular pathologies. Among these pro

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

2752433145 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档