课堂笔记.docxVIP

  1. 1、本文档共21页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
课堂笔记.docx

Revised GRE Analytical Writing 考试形式 Analysis of an issue, 30 minutes Analysis of an argument, 30 minutes 题库 www . ETS. Org GRE →Test takers → revised GRE → prepare for the test → analytical writing → topic pool Test Procedure 1, Waiting Area 2, Photo Room 3, Test Room Analysis of an argument preparing strategies 1, Critical thinking 2, 熟读题目 3, 闪光句型 4, 形成各类问题自己的论证模板(argument模板是针对每个段落的模板) 5, 列每道题提纲(注意提纲与模板的区别) 6, 全文练习10-20篇 How to analyze the topic Argument 题目结构: Evidence → conclusion Support 审题:分清论据和结论,看清推理关系 结论标志词:Therefore, thus, so, hence, consequently, evidently以及Clearly, should/must, 目的状语从句 Evidence: Facts Statistics Examples Ways of argumentation: Analogy Comparison Assumptions 写作原则 逻辑:切中要害 语言:言简意赅 词汇:正规书面写作语言 句式:多变,适度复杂 读题时需注意 论据结论各自的讨论对象 限定成分 绝对化词汇:all, any, every, only, most, best Argument writing steps 1, skim the topic and write the introduction读题,写开头; 2, input topic sentences for body paragraphs输入正文段段首句; 3, develop body paragraphs one by one逐一展开正文段; 4, write the conclusion写结尾; 5, checking检查 How to write the introduction Basic elements Concession (cc) Conclusion (cl) Evidence/Assumption (ev) Evaluation (el) (67)In the argument the arguer concludes that Rialto Theater must offer the same features as Apex, a newly opened theater, to attract more moviegoers (cl). As evidence the arguer points out many fancy functions featured by Apex and the dissatisfaction of moviegoers about high price of new movies (ev). However, lacking more accurate information we cannot make sure if the manager’s proposal could bring about desired effect as predicted (el). (142)In the argument the arguer claims that investing in high-quality gears could reduce the risk of being severely injured of roller skaters (cl). To support the recommendation, the arguer cites hospital statistics and assumes that the lack of protective equipment result in severe injuries in accidents (ev). However, several unwarranted assumptions render the argument unpersuasive as it stands. (1)

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

juhui05 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档