加氢站氢气运输方案比选_马建新.pdfVIP

36 5 ( ) V ol.36 No.5 2008 5 JOURNAL OF T ONGJ UN VERS T Y(NAT URAL SC ENCE) 　M ay 2008 马建新,刘绍军,周　伟,潘相敏 ( , 　201804) :, 、、 ., -1 -1 -1 2.3 ·kg , 0.4 ·kg , 6 ·kg . 30 %, 3 , . 、 , 、., , . :;;;; :T K 91　　　　　　:A 　　　　　　 :0253-374X(2008)05-06 15-05 Comparison of Hydrogen Transportation Methods for Hydrogen Refueling Station MA Jianxin, LIU Shaoj un, ZHOU Wei, PAN X iangmin (nstitute of Hydrogen Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China) Abstract:T his paper f irst presents a review of the existing hydrogen delivery methods.T hen a study is made of the delivery cost, energy consum ption and t he safety of hydrogen transportation by tube trailer, tank and pipe .A hy drogen transpo rtation cost model is established to calculate the large-scale hydrogen transportation cost in Shanghai.The results show gaseous hydrogen (GH )transpo rt at ion 2 cost by tube trailer is 2 .3 RM B kg-1,liquid hy drogen (LH )by t ank is 0.4 RMB kg-1,and GH2 by · 2 · -1 pipe is 6 RM B kg .Regarding to the energy consumption, hydrogen liquef actio n consumes more · than 30 %of it s low heat v alue (LHV );about 3 times of hydrogen compression .T here may exitst some risks such as.high-pressure, LH2 boil-off and permeability during t he delivery, w hich can be avoided cylinder design,regulation and so on .Based on the analysis result,hydrogen delivered by tube trailer is the best option fo r a plan to