论驰名商标司法认定-毕业论文.docVIP

摘要 最高人民法院于 2001 年 7 月颁布实施《关于涉及计算机域名民事纠纷案件适用法 律若干问题的解释》，第一次明确规定了人民法院有权对驰名商标进行认定。《商标法》 经过修订后，对驰名商标的保护及认定驰名商标需要考虑的因素作了规定；最高人民 法院又制定了相关司法解释，对认定驰名商标的法院、认定驰名商标的标准、认定的 效力等作了更具体的解释。至此，我国的驰名商标司法认定制度初步建立，驰名商标 的司法认定成为目前知识产权纠纷审判实践中讨论得比较多的话题，但也是存有不少 问题的领域，表现在不少基础理论问题仍未探讨清楚，具体的制度构建和司法实践存 在很多不足。 驰名商标的认定方式主要有行政认定和行政认定两种。相比较于行政认定，驰名 商标司法认定更能克服行政认定存在的不足，更具有合理性。驰名商标司法认定应遵 循以商标的影响力为依归、平衡驰名商标所有人与利益相关方的利益、被动认定和因 需认定四项原则。司法认定的实体问题包括地域范围、相关公众的范围、知晓程度的 理解与界定和较高声誉的理解与界定。程序构建也是驰名商标司法认定的重要内容， 包括提起主体、认定主体、认定的适用范围和认定的效力等几方面。以理想的驰名商 标司法认定制度模式为参照，我国驰名商标司法认定存在的缺陷包括驰名商标司法认 定过多过滥，质量参差不齐和通过虚假诉讼认定驰名商标，导致这些问题出现的原因 包括：驰名商标被异化，商标权利滥用；管辖权存有隐患，易受非法律因素影响；人 民法院认定驰名商标的标准把握不统一。根据这些原因，应从五方面完善我国驰名商 标司法认定：正确认识驰名商标，规范其使用、宣传工作；修改、完善法律的相关规 定，规范驰名商标的司法认定；防范当事人之间刻意制造纠纷；集中管辖涉及驰名商 标认定案件和制定司法解释，进一步细化认定驰名商标的标准。 关键词：驰名商标；司法认定；基本原则；具体构建；完善 I Abstract The Supreme People’s court had enforced the “judicial interpretations on several applying problems at DN disputes” on July 2007, which is the fist time that People’s court had been empowered to affirm the well-known mark. After the amendment, Trademark law provides that the protection of well-known mark and the considering elements for recognizing it, then the Supreme People’s court makes the judicial interpretations to specifically explain the very court, the tests and the force for determining the well-known mark. So the recognition system of well-known trademark have been established in China, but the judicial affirm, which has lots of problems that embody the basic theories, specific regulations and judicial practices, becomes the focus of judicial practices in the disputes of intellectual property. This thesis starts with the nature of well-known mark – the theory of special protection of law –to analyze the rationality of judicial recognition. On the basic of rationalities, it provides four principles for determining well-known mark and fully analyzes the tests, such as the scope of territory, the scope of public, the comprehension and definition of know and reputation.