论刑事被告人质证权保障研究.docxVIP

PAGE

PAGE1

摘要

随着审判制度的不断完善，人们对人权的关注日益增强，各国都十分注重对被告的质证权利。这一点与我国的法律制度相比较，在许多法制较先进的国家中，质证权早已成为了一种基本权利。本文首先从质证权的概念、内涵开始，然后以此为依据，对国外质证权保障进行了深入的了解与思考，并对我国有关质证权的立法与司法现状进行了反思，进而对我国的被告质证权进行了构建与完善。此外，在线诉讼远程刑事审判是网络时代司法对社会作出反应的产物，它已经逐渐获得了社会和法律的双重认同，而新冠疫情更是加快了它的落地。其中，质证的权利受到了极大的限制，这也是目前远程在线诉讼面临的最大难题。所以，构建顺应时代的质证权保障措施也是迫切需要的。

关键词：质证权；立法；证人出庭；在线诉讼

ABSTRACT

Withthedevelopmentofcourttrials,peoplepaymoreandmoreattentiontotheprotectionofhumanrights,andtherightofcross-examinationofdefendantsincriminalproceedingshasbeenpaidmoreandmoreattentionbyvariouscountries.Differentfrommycountry,inmanycountrieswithdevelopedruleoflaw,therightofcross-examinationhaslongbecomeanimportantrightofthedefendant.Thearticlestartswiththeconceptandcontentoftherightofcross-examination,andonthisbasis,throughtheunderstandingandthinkingoftheprotectionoftherightofcross-examinationinforeigncountries,reflectsonthelegislativeandjudicialstatusquooftherightofcross-examinationinmycountry,andconstructsandimprovestherightofcross-examinationofcriminaldefendantsinmycountry.Inaddition,asaproductofjudicialresponsetosocietyintheInternetera,remotecriminaltrialshavegraduallybeenrecognizedbysocietyandlaw,andtheCOVID-19pandemichasacceleratedthelandingofremotecriminaltrials.Amongthem,themostespeciallythederogationoftherightofcross-examinationhasbecomethebiggestdilemmaincurrentremotecriminaltrials.Therefore,itisalsourgenttobuildmeasurestoprotecttherightofcross-examinationinlinewiththetimes.

KEYWORDS：rightofconfrontation，legislatiao，witnesstestifyingincourt，Remotetiral

目录

TOC\o1-3\h\u15826摘要 I

11437ABSTRACT II

28259引言 1

2398一被告人质证权基础理论 2

141481.1质证权的定义 2

49931.2质证权内容 2

260321.3质证权理论基础 2

123891.3.1证据裁判原则 2

273121.3.2正当程序理论 3

46061.3.3控辩平衡理论 3

26933二我国刑事被告人质证权的现状、存在问题及原因分析