新世纪以来中德世界城市全球化模式对比分析.pdfVIP

人文地理 2018年第2期总第160期 文章编号:1003-2398(2018)02-0050-10 DOI:10.13959/j.issn. 1003-2398.2018.02.007 新世纪以来中德世界城市全球化模式对比分析 刘怀宽，杨 忍，薛德升 （中山大学地理科学与规划学院，广州510275） THETHE DISTINCTDISTINCT GLOBALIZATIONGLOBALIZATION MODEMODE ONON THETHE BASISBASIS OFOF SINO-DEUTSCHESINO-DEUTSCHE WORLDWORLD CITYCITY CONTRASTIVECONTRASTIVE ANALYSISANALYSIS LIU Huai-kuan ，YANG Ren ，XUE De-sheng (SchoolofGeography andPlanning,SunYat-senUniversity,Guangzhou510275,China) Abstract:Abstract: The classical world city theory presumes that all cities should follow a unitary route, predominated by transnational capital, to become a world city. As distinct national identity leads to various globalization routes, a critical opinion that the globalization mode should be diverse has received more and more concen- tration. Thus, this research uses descriptive statistic analysis and independent-sample T test to analyze the dif- ferences of process, pattern, scale, industry and dynamics between Chinese world cities and German ones listed in the World According to GaWC so as to better elaborate how distinct national identities lead to di- verse globalization modes. The quantitative contrastive analyses conclude with five results. Firstly, although the globalization of Chinese cities launched behind German cities, the potential growth momentum is stron- ger than the latter. Secondly, Chinese world cities currently agglomerate in Jing-Jin-Ji, Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta, the top three biggest urban clusters in China, presenting a tendency to disperse much broadly to midland and regions along the Yangtze River. Thirdly, the overall scale of population and gross do- mestic product in Chinese world