WTO在私营标准方面所开展的工作培训课件.pptVIP

Maybe more could be talked about the comparison between PUBIC and private standards. This presentation has only 17 slides. It could be further expanded. SPS Committee Meeting – June 2005: St. Vincent and the Grenadines reported concerns with EurepGAP certification, primarily for bananas Jamaica indicated similar problems for Fresh Fruits and Vegetables (FFVs) EC clarified that EurepGAP was a private sector consortium, not conflicting with its legislation Peru recalled application of Article 13 of SPS Agreement Mexico and Argentina supported the concerns raised Informal information session in October 2006 - UNCTAD, EurepGAP Meeting in February 2007: Several papers prepared by Secretariat, Members, observer organizations Decision to keep issue on agenda Second information session to be held in June 2007 SPS Committee Meeting – June 2005: St. Vincent and the Grenadines reported concerns with EurepGAP certification, primarily for bananas Jamaica indicated similar problems for Fresh Fruits and Vegetables (FFVs) EC clarified that EurepGAP was a private sector consortium, not conflicting with its legislation Peru recalled application of Article 13 of SPS Agreement Mexico and Argentina supported the concerns raised Informal information session in October 2006 - UNCTAD, EurepGAP Meeting in February 2007: Several papers prepared by Secretariat, Members, observer organizations Decision to keep issue on agenda Second information session to be held in June 2007 The categorization used between individual firm schemes, collective national and collective international schemes is one of several possible categorizations. Distinctions can also be drawn between pre- and post-farm gate standards, or between business?to?business standards or standards tied to a particular labelling or logo scheme intended for consumers. Collective schemes may also tackle a particular supply chain issue or objective, at a national or international level. The schemes listed above cover all these ca