妇科恶性肿瘤患者心理分析及医护合作健康教育效果评价-护理学专业论文.docxVIP

妇科恶性肿瘤患者心理分析及医护合作健康教育效果评价-护理学专业论文.docx

  1. 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
妇科恶性肿瘤患者心理分析及医护合作健康教育效果评价-护理学专业论文

万方数据 万方数据 结论:  1.大多数妇科肿瘤患者患病后有不同程度的焦虑、抑郁情绪。 2.医护合作健康教育健康教育模式能够显著降低妇科恶性肿瘤患者的负性情 绪,是一种行之有效的健康教育方式。 硕士研究生:李晓红(护理学) 指导老师:王爱敏教授 关键词:医护合作;健康教育;妇科;恶性肿瘤;心理分析 Abstract Object: The aim of the current study is investigating the effect of doctor-nurse collaborated heath education on psychology of patients with malignant gyneccologic oncology through psychology evaluating. The result showed in this study will provide a more effective method for heath education on patients with malignant gynecologic oncology . Furthermore, the patients will bebefited in psycology state and living quality. Methods: Questionnair method was employed in the present investigation.One hundred patients attending the hospital between 2013~11 and 2014~05 were included in this study.The patients were randomly divided into two groups,observe group and control group,each including 50 patients. The health education was performed in a doctor-nurse collaborated style,While,nurse-single style was used in the control group. Data was collected from the questionnaire at the first and last day in the hospital. Data was analyzed using SPSS 18.0 Results: In both groups, when the patients admitted to hospital, the basic general information was collected using questionnaire survey, and chi-square test was used to analyze the data. The results showed that there were no significant differences between the two groups in marital status, occupation, tumor type, age, educational level, economic status, whether fertility, reimbursement approach. The patients were evaluated using SDS and SAS Scale score. It showed that most of the patients have varying degrees of anxiety and depression. There is no significant differences between the mean scores between the two groups (P 0. 05). It showed that there is no significant difference between the two groups in number of patients suffering anxiety and depression. Comparing the anxiety and depression scores before and after the intervention between the two groups, signific

文档评论(0)

peili2018 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档