格构式钢管混凝土三肢柱风力发电机塔架的受力性能研究-防灾减灾工程及防护工程专业论文.docxVIP

格构式钢管混凝土三肢柱风力发电机塔架的受力性能研究-防灾减灾工程及防护工程专业论文.docx

  1. 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
格构式钢管混凝土三肢柱风力发电机塔架的受力性能研究-防灾减灾工程及防护工程专业论文

内 内蒙古科技大学硕士学位论文 II II Abstract With the continuous development of the wind power generator, the most commonly used tower, the cone tower, has been unable to meet the height requirements of the wind turbine because of its structural character and transportation limitations. The research group recommended a new type of tower, lattice CFST wind turbine generator tower, which can overcome some of the draw- backs of traditional tower. Based on the 1.5MW cone steel wind turbine generator tower as a reference, designed a lattice CFST three-limb wind turbine generator tower and reduced scale to a model of lattice CFST three-limb tower. Low cyclic loading test research was carried out on the model tower, analyzed the failure mode and characteristic, mechanical properties of the hysteretic behavior, ductility and energy dissipation. Also web-column stiffness ratio, diameter - thickness ratio and slenderness were analyzed as model tower parameters through finite element simulation. The experimental results show that the lateral displacement hysteretic curve shows plump shuttle shape. Specimen has good energy dissipation capacity. In the whole process, as the specimen was not symmetrical, the forward displacement curve was different from the backward one, the forward curve had no magnificent down-section, while the backward had both yield section and down section. The forward ductility parameter was 3.22, while the backward one was 2.70. The process of failure was the bottom pressure web yield, then the deformation wasn’t recovered, other layers was bent deformed around the imagined column bottom, finally the first layer was broke down from the inside until the entire tube broke down, test finished. From the Mises stress analysis of the first layer joint, the largest stress was the crown point and the saddle point of tension web to column intersection, while the smallest stress was the bottom point of the webs and column intersection.Based on the steel and concrete material mod

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

peili2018 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档