Knowledge-gaps in the Scaling-up Debate Nora Lustig Director …在扩大的辩论诺拉与导演的知识差距….pptVIP

下载本文档

7
0
约2.79千字
约 15页
2018-06-27 发布于福建
举报
版权申诉

Knowledge-gaps in the Scaling-up Debate Nora Lustig Director …在扩大的辩论诺拉与导演的知识差距….ppt

1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Knowledge-gaps in the Scaling-up Debate Nora Lustig Director …在扩大的辩论诺拉与导演的知识差距…

Closing the Knowledge-gap in the Scaling-up Debate:An AgendaNora LustigDirector of the Poverty Group, UNDPOctober 20, 2006 Main message: the “scaling-up” debate is stuck in the “rhetorical space” must advance in the “knowledge space” to make headway Is scaling-up of aid necessary to achieve the MDGs or, more generally, desirable human development outcomes? Most policy analysts, donors and multilaterals agree that scaling-up is desirable and needed. Why? Without aid, progress may be close to impossible due to poverty traps or it may be too slow. How much aid? There is no consensus. The methods differ. The UN and BWIs go each their separate ways. =Should work on a common framework. Despite the consensus in favor of scaling-up there are a number of concerns which affect the size and pace at which aid is made available: short-term concern: “Dutch disease”. long-term concern: aid-dependency. Because: 1. Positive impact on growth will only be visible in the long-run: 20 or 25 years. In the short-term, there may be trade-offs. = need “interim” indicators of progress. 2. No agreed upon method to estimate quantitatively the “growth dividend” of investing in human development. 3. Concern that returns or the growth dividend may not materialize because of corruption or gross inefficiencies. This leads to: = a more conservative approach in the short-term on the part of donors because they are not persuaded that aid will lead to growth and self-reliance. = more uncertainty in aid-flows because without solid evidence it is easier for aid to become a “political football”. = a more conservative approach on the part of IMF and WB. Leads to self-fulfilling prophecy of lower aid, lower growth, and lower human development. What is needed on the part of international organizations? Less “rethoric-based” and more “knowledge-based” discussion and advocacy: = refine methods to estimate scaling-up requirements; costing methods must incorporate second-round