Findings from the research understanding male participation and 研究了解男性参与.pptVIP

下载本文档

3
0
约2.44万字
约 13页
2018-06-24 发布于四川
举报
版权申诉

Findings from the research understanding male participation and 研究了解男性参与.ppt

1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Findings from the research understanding male participation and 研究了解男性参与

Findings from the research: understanding male participation and progression in higher education Ruth Woodfield Department of Sociology University of Sussex: r.woodfield@sussex.ac.uk Overview Why focus on men? Review of research in this area, focusing on 3 of my own studies Key take-home messages and questions arising from research Implications for the debate within HE Why men? Gender wage and seniority gap exists for graduates so why focus on men? This is true and no signs of current HE advantage changing this Women’s advantage in HE participation and achievement matches men’s in recent history It is a fast-paced social change – requires understanding Not just men as focus, but men and women as two sides of coin Accounting for previous male domination of HE Challenges: Then quantitative predominance linked to qualitative cultural dominance - change possible And muted challenges or defences: Men and women have relatively fixed differences: cognitive Personality Behavioural Leads to different ‘choices’ – change has limitations Undertaking research on men in HE: the issues Disadvantage discourses are often vague, all-encompassing (accurate?), stable Historically much research Oxbridge-based – skewed results Uptake rate to research requests and tasks different to women Self-report issue Much research on gender but focus is women’s participation and progress; male is underside of coin Gender Firsts study Men get more Firsts Key modes of explanation: Gender-linked cognitive and personality trait differences gender-differentiated dispositions Men risk-takers, have flair; women conscientious Subject area differences: Men are in the First-Rich disciplines Gender and Firsts… Analysed all graduates over 8 years RESULTS: Men’s dominance of Firsts was weakening yearly Largely due to dominance in First-rich disciplines Women in these disciplines tended to be awarded more Firsts than men Key messages: Effect of gender-differentiated traits was marginal We were look